CCMIN102087 - Laserfiche WebLink

377 the Black's would work with staff regarding the fire turn-around and the grading. Mr. Don Babbitt, Architect, presented four plans in overlay fashion to show the changes made since the original plan was approved. Mayor Mercer expressed confusion as to which plan had been approved by Council and which plans had been reviewed by the Planning Commission. Ms. Lewman, Attorney representing the Blacks, stated that Council approved the original Plan A proposal; the plan as proposd tonight has two changes - the hammerhead and the grading; the location is the same. Planning Commission has .... not reviewed this plan. Mr. Fraser presented the proposed landscaping plans; which he felt would appropriate screen the house. Mr. Jim Balch, 14 Grey Eagle Court, stated he relied heavily on the staff reports when he bought his property; the area where the Black's propose to build their home was to be an open field. He felt he had made a lot of con- cessions to accommodate the Blacks. He stated he raised several questions at the last homeowners meeting which he did not receive a satisfactory answer relative to the height and the building pad. He stated the movement of the building as proposed will move it 30-40 feet to the east and raised up 8 feet, which has not been addressed by staff. He stated the PUD was originally ap- proved with the building pad down low the Blacks want to raise the building pad and but the hill so they will have a view; he felt this is a violation to his rights. Mr. Bob Grove, 28 Grey Eagle Court, stated he attended the homeowners meeting and also participated in the vote by mail. After receiving a letter addressed to him by the attornies for the Black's he felt he had an obligation to address what he felt is blatent misinformation in the letter. He stated Council looked to the homeowners association to determine whether or not the objections raised as to the location of this house were significant. He ad- vised that out of 22 lots 2/3 did not approve Plan 3. He questioned the legality of counting the five written votes received after the homeowners meeting. He stated that Mr. O'Callaghan and Mr. Harris have tried to get an accurate concenses of the homeowners; they felt there is not overwhelming sup- port for the proposed plan they are in favor of the plan as originally approved. Mr. Paul Molkenbuhr, 15 Grey Eagle Court, stated the Black's and their representatives met with the homeowners at an association meeting, a vote was taken, and he did not feel a revote would be appropriate. He added that it was not determined whether the written votes should be taken before or after the meeting. Ms. Randie Black, 3742 Pinot Court, stated she had tried in every way to adjust and readjust her house plans to meet all restraints. She stated they want to move the house up to provide a view out the back and they will put in trees to block the house from the view of the neighbors. She stated the grad- ing is not a problem with the fire department. She appealed to Council to consider her need to construct her home to best suit her needs. Mr. Mike Isabel, 9 Roman Eagle Court, stated he does not feel it is legal to take a revote regarding this matter. - 10 - 10-20-87