CCMIN050388 - Laserfiche WebLink

287 Council discussion ensued as to whether or not this facility should come under the Housing Authority Board of Commissioners or some other Commission. Ms. Bengtson stated that up to this date the project has been developed under the Human Services Commission with assistance from the Park and Recreation Commission. She felt this is the appropriate Commission to oversee the Senior Citizen Center. She advised that a member from the Housing Authority Board of Commissioners has been a representative on the Task Force. Mr. Walker advised this project is dependent upon the Corporation Yard being moved. It was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember But- ler, that Resolution No. 88-208, approval of the conceptual site plan for the Pleasanton Senior Center, and authorizing the City to enter into an agreement with Group 4/Architecture Research and Planning, Inc., to prepare a complete preliminary design package; and authorizing execution of the agreement by the appropriate city officials, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, Wilson, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None item 12b Change the Street Name of Via De Los Milagros west of Valley Avenue to Paseo Santa Cruz Mr. Walker presented the report of the Director of Planning and Community Development {SR 88:203) dated May 3, 1988, regarding this matter. It was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember Wil- son, that Resolution No. 88-209, renaming the existing portion of the public street known as Via de los Milagros west of Valley Avenue to Paseo Santa Cruz, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, Wilson, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None item 12c Growth Management Report Mr. Walker presented the report of the Director of Planning and Community Development (SR 88:192) dated May 3, 1988, regarding this matter. Mr. Roger Manning, 239 Main Street, stated that current applications for growth management approval are for units that are for less than the units that are available; 127 out of a possible 162. It is basically a technical deci- sion as to whether the two large apartment projects which are already approved are going to be considered exempt. The Council~s decision on this technicali- ty however will effect only small projects; projects that are owned in most cases by local residents and long time business men from Pleasanton or builders who have built small projects here in Pleasanton before. It does not affect the megabucks developers out of the area who already have their proj- ects approved. All of the projects are currently in the Vintage Hills area which is a fairly unique situation. Vintage Hills and the projects that are there now are currently under a moratorium until Bernal Avenue extension is started. Of all the areas in Pleasanton this is the best area for the least impact on the infrastructure. The staff report indicated that these projects - 17 5-3-88