My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN100290
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
CCMIN100290
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:55:33 AM
Creation date
10/29/1999 11:30:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
__ Mr. Lee replied that square footage is not directly related to <br /> the amount of land displaced and that the amount of affordable <br /> housing would not depend on square footage. He stated that a home <br /> with a large square footage could be built on a relatively small <br /> lot, given a higher FAR, in the same way that a single-family could <br /> have a smaller FAR home on a big lot. <br /> <br /> Mr. Mercer asked Mr. Lee to comment on the Bren Company <br /> situation that it is being charge a different rate because it will <br /> build separate units rather than share common walls. <br /> <br />O9 Mr. Lee replied that as stated in the Staff Report, the Bren <br />~ development is an exception to the rule. He stated that it can be <br />~_, argued that density has no correlation with the need for affordable <br /> housing. However, the problem staff has is that there are very few <br />< remaining high density residential parcels in the City, and <br />Z charging a lower fee for single-family homes in those parcels would <br /> encourage single-family homes in high density parcels which are <br /> intended for multiple-family units. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver stated that fees should be established and that it <br /> would make sense to correlate the fees with square footage. He <br /> said that the escalator cost should be based on the CPI and that <br /> appeals should go through the normal process. He added that there <br /> should be incentives to promote housing and that the fee should not <br /> apply to remodeling and reconstruction. He pointed out that <br /> providing affordable housing for both residents and employees of <br /> Pleasanton could be worked out without setting priorities. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brandes inquired what the definition of "substandard <br /> residential units" is and how it would be measured. <br /> <br /> Mr. Roush replied that the Uniform Housing Code provides that <br /> the Building Official determines when a house is substandard. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brandes commented that there should be a broader <br /> definition and clearer understanding of the term because some <br /> residents are concerned that affordable housing would diminish <br /> their property values. He mentioned that affordable housing means <br /> affordable land, which Pleasanton does not have, and that the <br /> market, rather than the fees, should take care of affordable <br /> housing. He added that he was opposed to the imposition of the fee <br /> on commercial development in the City at this time because the <br /> City's present economic condition for the past ten years was <br /> brought about by the advent of the Business Park in North <br /> Pleasanton. He pointed out that the business parks provide the <br /> opportunity for people who live in Pleasanton to work in Pleasanton <br /> and that the best ways to assure that this community maintains a <br /> strong and sound fiscal position is to ensure that business parks <br /> have a chance to expand and complete their operations as long as <br /> <br /> 10-2-90 <br /> - 17 - <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.