CCMIN100290 - Laserfiche WebLink

39 site and that the landscaping plan would not provide adequate screening. It was moved by Mr. Mercer, and seconded by Mr. Tarver, that Resolution No. 90-183 be adopted, upholding the appeal, thereby denying Case Z-89-557, the application of Manoj Dave for design review approval for an approximately 10,100 square foot single- family residence and landscaping plan located at 9900 Longview Lane (Upper Longview). The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Mohr, Tarver and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: Councilmember Butler ABSTAIN: None Item 6b GP-90-4, Application of the City of Pleasanton to Amend the Housing Element of the General Plan to Include New Regional Housing Share Allocations and Other Policy and Program Revisions Consider Adoption of a Negative Declaration Mr. Swift presented his report (SR 90:395) regarding the matter. Mr. Mercer declared the public hearing open on the application. There being no testimony, Mr. Mercer declared the public hearing closed. Mr. Mercer stated that he agreed with the provisions of Program 7.13 and Program 8.3 requiring all projects that are rezoned to a medium or higher density to include low or moderate income units in the projects; however, the City could benefit more if the option were available for some projects to contribute money rather than include those units in their projects. Mr. Brandes concurred. He stated that the program is absolutely inappropriate and restrictive and that Council should have the option to add conditions to a project as it sees fit. He suggested that the language of the programs be modified to reflect that in-lieu fees could be required at the option of the Council. There were suggestions made either to delete the word "all" or add the word "appropriate" after the word "all" in both programs. Mr. Mercer agreed that any future Council should have the choice of whether to require a monetary contribution or affordable units. 10-2-90 - 11 -