My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN041691
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
CCMIN041691
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:55:13 AM
Creation date
10/29/1999 11:21:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
147 <br /> <br />7. SPECIAL AND INFORMATION REPORTS <br />Item 7a <br />Case PUD-90-6-1M/Division Street Victorians, Division Street <br />Partners. Application for Minor Modification to PUD-90-6 to Chanqe <br />the Floor Plans and Building Elevations of an Approved Development <br />Plan for Nine Single-Family Homes Located at 1045 Division Street <br />(IR 91:17) <br /> <br /> No action was required or taken by the Council on this item. <br /> <br />Item 7b <br />Actions of the Desiqn Review Board and of the Planning Commission <br />at Their Meetings of April 9-10, 1991 (IR 91:18) <br /> <br /> No action was required or taken by the Council on this item. <br /> <br />8. MATTERS INITIATED BY COUNCILMEMBERS <br />Item 8a <br />Update Report - Potential Initiation of Rezoning for Property <br />Located at 4167 and 4175 First Street (SR 91:150) <br /> <br /> Mr. Seth Bland, 6233 Alisal Street, encouraged the Council to <br />review and evaluate the development approval process at the Staff <br />and Council levels and to reconsider the proposal to change the <br />property's zoning from "CS" to "CC." He expressed disappointment <br />at his inability to address the City's concerns regarding the <br />project and indicated that he is withdrawing his application. <br /> <br /> Mr. Mercer apologized, on behalf of the City, for the <br />substantial amount of money and time Mr. Bland spent on the <br />project. He stated that Council will meet with the Planning <br />Commissioners and Design Review Board members to address the <br />development approval process. He then asked the Council if it <br />still wishes to proceed with rezoning the property since the <br />application has been withdrawn. <br /> <br /> Ms. Scribner stated that rezoning the property may no longer <br />be necessary since the application has been withdrawn and the <br />Planning Commission, the Design Review Board and Staff have been <br />made aware of the concerns regarding the properties by the downtown <br />area. She inquired, however, if there were other uses within the <br />current zoning that would be acceptable for the property in <br />questions. <br /> <br /> Mr. Mercer commented that some commercial service uses are <br />necessary in the community. He added that Council can either <br />rezone the property to meet other uses or require a Conditional Use <br />Permit for any development proposed for the site. <br /> <br /> - 9 - <br /> 4-16-91 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.