Laserfiche WebLink
423 <br /> <br /> It was moved by Mr. Butler, seconded by Ms. Mohr, that <br />Resolution No. 91-140 be adopted, referring the Petition for Writ <br />of Mandate in the Alameda County Superior Court, Case No. <br />H-155613-5, in the matter of City of Hayward v. Alameda County <br />Local Agency Formation Commission (City of Pleasanton, Real Party <br />in Interest) to the City Attorney for action as deemed necessary <br />and appropriate to defend the City of Pleasanton, its officers, <br />agents, and employees in said action, as set forth in the Staff <br />Report. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mohr, Scribner and Mayor Mercer <br />NOES: Councilmember Tarver <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br />14. COMMUNICATIONS <br /> <br /> There were none. <br /> <br />15. CITY COUNCIL CALENDAR <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta presented the City Council Calendar for the <br />information of the Councilmembers. <br /> <br />16. CLOSED SESSION <br /> <br /> Council adjourned to a Closed Session at 10:36 p.m. to discuss <br />Dav~ v. City of Pleasanton, Labor Relations, Measure D Implications <br />in City of Dublin v. County of Alameda, and Proposed Litigation <br />Against Alameda County Regarding SB 2557. <br /> <br />17. ADJOURNMENT <br /> <br /> There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at <br />11:25 p.m., to meet again in Regular Session on Tuesday, <br />September 3, 1991, at 7:30 p.m., in the City Council Chambers. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br /> CITY CLER <br /> <br /> - 24 - <br /> 8-20-91 <br /> <br /> <br />