Laserfiche WebLink
265 <br /> <br />mitigation fee. He added that a majority of the Council and of the <br />community have indicated that the City should continue moving <br />forward while working at solutions to the City's problems. And <br />this has brought forward a wonderful city with many things that <br />other cities do not have. <br /> <br /> Ms. Scribner inquired what the time limit on Growth Management <br />allocations is. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift replied that developers for residential growth have <br />2½ years to get a final map. Single-family tracts can be built any <br />time thereafter, but apartment units have to be under construction <br />within that time frame. Commercial and industrial developers <br />receive straight Design Review Board approval of projects for one <br />year with a possible extension. <br /> <br /> Ms. Scribner commented that it might be prudent to set a <br />certain time limit to build single-family tracts after the final <br />map is approved. She then stated that she is hesitant to adopt a <br />target allocation with the possibility of disregarding the Ruby <br />Hill Project because that project would affect the City, whether it <br />is developed in the County or in the City. She also agreed with <br />Ms. Mohr that allocation should be set aside for any low and <br />moderate income projects in the future. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift stated that the City no longer has any low income <br />allocation that was set aside in the past. He indicated that what <br />the City has is the ability to approve lower income projects that <br />qualify as exempt projects to a Growth Management limit beyond the <br />650 units that would otherwise be the maximum. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Mr. Tarver to adopt Option 4, setting a target <br />allocation that would allow only "for sale" moderate income unit <br />projects, or 403 units excluding Ruby Hill, 478 units with it. <br /> <br /> The motion died for lack of a second. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Ms. Mohr, and seconded by Ms. Scribner, to <br />adopt Option 3, the "Moderate Growth" scenario, with the amendment <br />that the target allocation be set at up to 500 units, excludinq <br />Ruby Hill. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Mohr, Scribner and Mayor Mercer <br />NOES: Councilmember Tarver <br />ABSENT: Councilmember Butler <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br /> Mr. Mercer summarized that Mr. Butler and he would allow for <br />a maximum of 500 units, but would try to bring it down to as low as <br /> <br /> - 16 - <br /> 6-18-91 <br /> <br /> <br />