My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN052191
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
CCMIN052191
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:55:13 AM
Creation date
10/29/1999 10:34:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
187 <br /> <br /> Mr. Donald McKenzie, 790 East Angela Street, in response to <br />the statement that the extension of Mirador Drive would pose a <br />threat to the pedestrian safety of school children, stated that <br />Mirador Drive is a 40-foot wide street with sidewalks and school <br />crossing guards across Vineyard Avenue and Kottinger Drive. On the <br />other hand, Angela Street, in the Harris Acres area betweenWhiting <br />Street and Third Street, is 29 feet wide and has no sidewalks. <br />People walk on the street, and cars park on both sides of the road. <br />He pointed out that the General Plan was developed by many citizens <br />and that the EIR favors the extension as an opportunity to improve <br />traffic circulation in the area with minimal effects on the <br />neighborhood. In addition, both the Planning Commission and Staff <br />recommend the extension. <br /> <br /> Ms. Karen Kearl, 4524 Mirador Drive, stated that the City <br />should first address the needs of the existing residents before <br />providing for the future. She pointed out that the Council should <br />not consider the advantages of future residents on the Bonde Ranch <br />at the expense of the quality of life of the people living in the <br />Mirador Drive area. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pereira stated that several comments were made at the <br />April 2nd City Council meeting which he would like to address at <br />this time: (1) The Danville project with reported land slippage <br />problems is not a Shapell Industries project. (2) Shapell <br />Industries has signed an agreement with the Pleasanton Unified <br />School District which addresses the direct and cumulative impacts <br />of the project on schools. The approximate number of children to <br />be generated by the project is 32, the size of a little bit more <br />than one classroom. The agreement provides the District with the <br />equivalent of 4½ classrooms. (3) About 100 feet of green belt <br />separates the Ventana Hills development and the Bonde Ranch <br />development. Shapell Industries has been conferring with City <br />staff on the Bonde development since 1987, and the Ventana Hills <br />home of a previous speaker was not purchased until 1990. (4) Bonde <br />Ranch is not the appropriate location for a north-south collector <br />road. (5) The development would generate not 14,000, but only <br />6,200, trips per day, which is significantly less than the traffic <br />on Black Avenue. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pereira then addressed the comments made at this Council <br />meeting: (1) Shapell Industries had no intention to sell the <br />project to another developer upon approval. Custom lots will be <br />sold; however, the comprehensive design guidelines reviewed and <br />approved by Staff, the Design Review Board and the Planning <br />Commission address the concerns on the units to be built on the <br />custom lots. (2) Geologists and engineering consultants have <br />agreed that the Bonde Ranch will probably assist in alleviating the <br />water seepage problems by reducing the amount of groundwater flow <br /> <br /> - 11 - <br /> 5-21-91 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.