CCMIN090391 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Roush replied that the total number of units that would get preference or an exemption is 200, whether they come in one year or phased over several years. He continued that should the School DistriCt have more than 200 proposed units, the balance would be considered with all other Growth Management applicants. It was moved by Mr. Butler, and seconded by Ms. Mohr, that Resolution No. 91-153 be adopted, approving the Agreement between the City of Pleasanton and the Pleasanton Unified School District for the exchange of real property, as set forth in the Staff Report. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mohr, Scribner, Tarver and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Item 12d Amendment to the Aqreement Between the City of Pleasanton and the Pleasanton Unified School District Relatinq to the Joint Use of Two Gymnasiums (SR 91:367) Ms. Scribner requested a clarification of the $3 million referred to under i~.A. City's Contribution to City and School Facilities as the total amount the City would pay the School District. Since the City and the School District are s~aring the costs equally, would the City pay less if the final costs are less than $6 million? Ms. Acosta explained that there would be some City-incurred expenses which would not make the final costs exactly 50-50; however, it would be close to that, and the City's maximum expense would be $3 million. Mr. Mercer stated that the City may require some things in the gymnasiums that the School District may not need, such as office space or additional lockers, and which would be paid for by the City. Mr. Mercer indicated that it is good to see the School District and the City work together for the benefit of the community. He thanked the members of the School District Board for all their time and effort in helping the City to complete the project. - 13 - 9-3-91