My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN090391
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
CCMIN090391
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:55:12 AM
Creation date
10/29/1999 10:22:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
21 <br /> <br /> Mr. Butler asked Mr. Kenny if he agreed fully with the <br />conditions proposed by the Commission. <br /> <br /> Mr. Kenn~ stated that his original proposal was to give the <br />entire $12,000 at one time so the Center would not have to come <br />back in six months. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Mr. Tarver, and seconded by Ms. Mohr, that <br />Resolution No. 91-151 be adopted, granting $12,000 to the Family <br />Crisis Center as one-time-only funds, with the stipulation that it <br />be funded in two increments of $6,000, the first being available <br />immediately and the second after six months, contingent upon the <br />Family Crisis Center and The Center submitting quarterly financial <br />reports that will include the status of fund raising activities and <br />satisfactory review of the reports by Staff and the Human Services <br />Commission, as set forth in the Staff Report. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mohr, Scribner, Tarver and Mayor <br /> Mercer <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br />~tem 12c <br />Aqreement Between the City of Pleasanton and Pleasanton Unified <br />School District for the Exchanqe of Real Property (SR 91:368) <br /> <br /> Mr. Butler stated that he is satisfied with the language in <br />the Agreement with respect to the proposed Growth Management <br />exemption for the School District because it keeps the exemption <br />within the Growth Management process while giving the School <br />District as much assurance as possible that it would be extended <br />preferential treatment. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr stated that the Agreement is a good compromise for <br />both the City and the School District because it addresses the <br />needs of the School District to maximize the value of its property <br />and does not impact the City negatively since the units will be <br />accommodated in the Growth Management Program. <br /> <br /> Ms. Scribner inquired if the total number of exempted units <br />mentioned in Section 7.3 of the Agreement referred to 200 units <br />phased over several years or in one given year. <br /> <br /> - 12 - <br /> 9-3-91 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.