My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN030392
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
CCMIN030392
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:55:03 AM
Creation date
10/29/1999 10:04:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
106 <br /> <br /> and planning processing to build a dam. Zone 7 will need to meet <br /> with the cities to determine what their needs are. <br /> <br /> Mr. Figuers invited the public and Council to the Zone 7 <br /> special meeting on March 25, 1992. The purpose of this meeting was <br /> to discuss Dublin's request for Zone 7 to expand its supply and <br /> allocation. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver asked how Zone 7 planned on distributing the cost <br /> of newly supplied water. He asked if it would be equally <br /> distributed or based on additional demands. <br /> <br /> Mr. Figuers answered that that had not yet been determined. <br /> His opinion would be if new water supplies were needed, the new <br /> capital costs should bepaidbynew development. The residents of <br /> the valley should not be penalized for the infrastructure costs. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver referred to the maximum of 70,000 dwelling units <br /> and. asked if Zone 7 was supplying water for the existing General <br /> Plans, which did not include anything that Council had not taken <br /> action on such as, the Ridgelands or Dublin's expansion. He also <br /> asked if Zone 7 had reviewed each of the cities' General Plans <br /> because in some cases the Plans were inconsistent with the Alameda <br /> County General Plan. <br /> <br /> Mr. Fiquers explained the existing 70,000 units was based upon <br /> the existing General Plan of Alameda County. He stated that Zone <br /> 7 'had not looked into the cities' General Plans. He assumed that <br /> Alameda County and the City of Pleasanton had met to discuss this. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr stated that there were some recreational value in <br /> having a large body of water. She asked if recreational fees were <br /> included in the calculations to build a dam. <br /> <br /> Mr. Figuers explained that there would be a dollar value by <br /> people using the park service, but having that park infrastructure <br /> there severely limits the use of the Del Valle water. If there <br /> were another intensive rainfall at this time Zone 7 would have to <br /> release most of that water because the water level is almost up to <br /> the limit of the infrastructure of the park. Zone 7 would like <br /> another dam behind Lake De1 Valle which would be strictly used for <br /> water storage and flood control. <br /> <br /> Mr. Mohr asked if Zone 7 would be factoring in the chain of <br /> lakes and gravel quarries for flood control. <br /> <br /> Mr. Figuers answered that that had not been determined. The <br /> lakes and quarries are part of the ground water basin. <br /> <br /> 3/3/92 <br /> 4 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.