Laserfiche WebLink
8O <br /> <br /> other special events on the City's revenues and expenditures, and <br /> make appropriate recommendations in a future report to Council; 4) <br /> complete the DeveloPment Fee Study and present a recommendation to <br /> Council regarding the implementation of a traffic impact fee and a <br /> facilities fee; and 5) engage in a study to update the park <br /> Dedication In-Lieu Fee. <br /> <br /> The roll call vote was as follows: <br /> AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mohr, Scribner, Tarver and Mayor <br /> Mercer <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSENT: None <br /> ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br /> Item 12b <br /> Item 4a <br /> Adopt Ordinance No. 1545, amendinq Ordinance No. 1336, as amended, <br /> and section 17.36.230 of the pleasanton Municipal Code, as amended, <br /> concerninq lapsinq of Growth Manaqement approval. <br /> <br /> Peter MacDonald, 400 Main Street, referred to the proposed <br /> ordinance and suggested that the applicant pay only the growth <br /> management fee by April 1, 1992. (A handout was given to Council <br /> listing the building permit fees.) He explained that the applicant <br /> was unable to pay at this time all of the fees listed ($110,530). <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer clarified Mr. MacDonald's request. Me indicated <br /> the applicant would pay $750 per unit by April 1, 1992 and then pay <br /> the balance when the building permits were issued. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr asked if the applicants would lose the growth <br /> management fee if they were unable to pay the building permit fees. <br /> <br /> Mr. MacDonald answered yes. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver asked when these units would be built. <br /> <br /> Mr. MacDonald responded that they hoped to have this project <br /> complete by the summer. They need to get their final map filed and <br /> the bank loan approved. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarvet believed that the ordinance should remain the same <br /> as introduced and the fees should be collected. If the applicant <br /> was unable to pay the fees by April 1, 1992 then he would need to <br /> come back through the Growth Management process. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Ms. Scribner, and seconded by Mr. Tarver, <br /> that Ordinance No. 1545 be adopted, amending Ordinance No. 1336, as <br /> amended, and Section 17.36,230 of the Pleasanton Municipal Code, as <br /> amended, concerning lapsing of Growth Management approval. <br /> <br /> 2/4/92 <br /> 26 <br /> <br /> <br />