Laserfiche WebLink
167 <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift answered that there is no plant on line but the San <br />Francisco Water Department project was going to be discussed as <br />part of the plan. He stated that projects were not approved yet <br />through TWA. <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer confirmed there is a possibility for further law <br />suits from Contra Costa County. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver then referred to page 196 of the staff report and <br />asked for clarification. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift explained that this section of the staff report <br />refers to the LAVWMA capacity for the wet weather flow and the <br />range changes for dry weather flow. He indicated that if everything <br />that has ever been approved were suddenly built and occupied then <br />LAVWMA would be 20% over capacity. Staff and DSRSD went through <br />long calculations to see if by 1996 the system could handle the <br />flow and it was deemed to be able to handle-the growth. There are <br />interim steps available to increase we weather capacity for LAVWMA. <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer stated that there was approximately 450,000 <br />gallons of dry weather flow remaining and wet weather flow is three <br />to four times what dry weather flow is. The average house in <br />Pleasanton uses an average of 220 gallons a day (before water <br />conservation); 175 gallons used in a condominium; and a 150 gallons <br />in apartment buildings. At an average of 200 gallons average used <br />by the year 2000, the total amount used would be approximately <br />37,000 gallons. To assume that the City is out of sewer capacity, <br />the City is 20% over the sewer capacity, and that the solution will <br />never be addressed is incorrect. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver stated that helagreed with the staff recommendation <br />listed in the 7/7/92 staff report which suggests not allocating all <br />of the projects so that there is flexibility for future Council's. <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer reiterated the numbers of units per year that he <br />and Mr. Butler recommended. He disagreed that there was not enough <br />flexibility remaining for future Council's. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr stated that there was a City sponsored low income <br />housing project that would soon be developed. She asked if there <br />was sufficient capacity to accommodate the housing in the proposed <br />plan. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift answered that there was sufficient capacity only if <br />the housing project is submitted to Council before 1993 or else it <br />would have to be built in 1995. <br /> <br />8/4/92 9 <br /> <br /> <br />