Laserfiche WebLink
169 <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift stated that the primary concern of staff was to <br />accommodate all of the units with past approvals. He felt that <br />there was a lot of the flexibility that the Growth Management <br />always contained included in this recommendation. Staff wanted to <br />bring to Council's attention the projects compared to other project <br />coming in the future. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver commented that if Council was truly concerned with <br />future flexibility and citizens General Plan review, there would be <br />even more reason not to make these allocation until that General <br />Plan Review and the citizens input was given to Council and the new <br />Council was elected in November. <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer stated that a lot of effort went into this <br />process to leave as much flexibility as possible for future <br />Council's. He felt that he and Mr. Butler achieved that. He <br />explained that the increase in fees is what will generate the money <br />to continue to built the capital improvements and the <br />infrastructure that the citizens enjoy. Those projects will <br />generate monies that the City can use to develop additional <br />recreation services etc. that the community needs. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift asked that the Growth Management fee be included in <br />the motion. He also mentioned that the Chu project needed action <br />to be taken on it. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr felt that it was not appropriate to include the 88 <br />unit portion of the Chu project at this time. She amended her <br />motion to include the fees previously established. <br /> <br /> Mr. Roush explained that Council previously authorized Growth <br />Management agreements that include a $2200 fee and the $750 fee <br />plus the water and sewer provisions. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Ms. Mohr, and seconded by Mayor Mercer, that <br />Resolution No. 92-159 be adopted, approving the Growth Management <br />allocations for 1993 including the fees previously established and <br />the 88-unit Chu project is'to reapply in 1993. <br /> <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Mohr and Mayor Mercer <br />NOES: Councilmember Tarver <br />ABSENT: Councilmembers Butler and Scribner <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br />Item 8a (This item was moved forward) <br />Consider Openinq Kolln Street at Valley Avenue (SR92:324) <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer asked that all those people who were in favor of <br />removing the wall speak first and then those opposed could speak. <br /> <br />8/4/92 11 <br /> <br /> <br />