CCMIN070792 - Laserfiche WebLink

130 It was moved by Ms. Mohr, that Ordinance No. 1570 be introduced, to be read by title only and waiving further reading thereof, approving PUD-92-4, Miriam Chu and Max Gahrahmat, with the following conditions: directing'developer to work with staff to reconfigure Lots 86, 87, and 88, accessing them from new street; bulb to be designed to City standards; and access road brought in as necessary to meet the need for park servicing and emergency access. The motion died for lack of a second. It was moved by Mr. Butler, and seconded byMs. Scribner, that Ordinance No. 1570 be introduced, to be read by title only and waiving further reading thereof, approving PUD-92-4, Miriam Chu and Max Gahrahmat, changing the access of Lot 86 to be from new street. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mohr, Scribner and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: Councilmember Tarver ABSTAIN: None Item 6d AP-92-10/V-92-7, Michael D. 8ohibler ~ppeal of the decision of the Planninq Commission denyinq an application for a variance from the Municipal Code to reduce the r%quired fence setback for a street side yard of the residence located at located at 4298 Fairlands Drive. Zoninq for the p=0perty is R-1-6500. (SR92:290) Michael Schibler, 4298 Fairlands Drive, explained that he was building a retaining wall with a fence above that around the side of his home which is on the corner facing the street. The problem that staff had indicated to him was that the wall was too close to the sidewalk at most points and does not meet a five foot set back. He was now applying for a variance. He explained that the wall meets code standards but the fence is 5 1/2 feet high and is built above the wall. The fence height and the wall height equal eight feet. He stated that the City code addressed the fence and wall separately. Mr. Schibler explained that by moving the fence back an average of 11 1/2 inches would not change the affect of the appearance but would create a lot of work. He did not believe that this fence and wall would create a tunnel effect. (Photos were given to Council of the property and the construction in place). He said that he had planned to landscape this area as soon as it was completed and he described the types of plants that would be used. A petition in Mr. Schibler's favor was also presented to Council. The reason he wanted this wall and fence was to increase his privacy, allow for a "dog run" along the side of his home which is closest to the street, and decrease the noise from the street traffic. He concluded by asking for Council approval. 7/7/92 12