Laserfiche WebLink
87 <br /> <br /> work out a better plan. He believed the applicant was successful <br /> in doing that. He explained that there was no guarantee that the <br /> project would receive any permits. He felt that it did not make <br /> sense for Council to vote unanimously for a project but then say <br /> that it could not be built. He supported including the project in <br /> growth management for 1993. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver asked staff if growth management had been extended. <br /> <br /> Mr. RouGh said the Growth Management Ordinance had not been <br /> amended to permit projects which are approved after the first <br /> meeting in April to apply. Therefore, for this project to <br /> eligible. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Ms. Scribner, and seconded by Mr. Tarver, to <br /> deny the request of Marsh/Smith Associates for 1993 growth <br /> management consideration. <br /> <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Scribner, Tarver <br />NOES: Mayor Mercer and Councilmember Mohr <br />ABSENT: Councilmember Butler <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br /> Due to the tie vote this item was continued to the June 23, <br /> 1992 Special City Council meeting. <br /> <br />GP-92-2/PUD-92-Sm City of Pleasanton <br />Application to chanae the General Plan Land Use Desiqnation from <br />Public Health and Safety to Low Density Residential; a~4 <br />application to Chanqe the zoninq desiq~_~tion from the <br />(Aaricultural) District to the "PUD-LDR" {Pla~ed Unit Development <br />- Low Density Residential District on an apDrox{m~te 10-acre site <br />located on the east side of Foothill Roadm north of the verona <br />~ (SR92:254) <br /> <br /> Mr. Mercer declared the public hearing open on the <br />application. <br /> <br /> There being no testimony, Mr. Mercer declared the public <br />hearing closed. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr explained that the 10-acre property on Foothill came <br />to the City by the County's approval process. She said that the <br />lots had already been approved and believed that these units would <br />have no noticeable impact on the City. <br /> <br />6/16/92 9 <br /> <br /> <br />