Laserfiche WebLink
12 <br /> <br /> There was considerable discussion on the intention of this program and how broad <br /> it should be. <br /> <br /> Ms. Scribner felt that it is necessary to examine each project individually an .~ <br /> program should be broad enough to work for all of the existing projects. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Ms. Scribner, and seconded by Ms. Mob. r, to negotiate a <br /> reallocation of growth management approvals acceptable to the developer (Staff Report: <br /> Option 6). <br /> <br /> It was moved by Mayor Tarver, and seconded by Ms. Dennis, mending Ms. <br /> Scribner's motion, to negotiate a reallocation of growth management approvals acceptable <br /> to the developer, only to be used for those project where growth management has been <br /> approved (Staff Report: Option 6) based on the DeSilva proposal. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Mr. Pico to call for the question. <br /> <br /> The motion died for lack of a second. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver withdrew his motion and Ms. Dennis withdrew her second. <br /> <br /> Ms. Scribner mended her motion, and Ms. Mohr seconded, that Resolution_No. <br /> 93-52, be adopted, to negotiate a reallocation of existing growth management appx <br /> that are generally customized to each specific project but using the DeSilva coneel a: <br /> a basis to begin to discuss provisions which both the developer and the City will accept <br /> <br /> The roll call vote was as follows: <br /> AYES: Councilmembers Dennis, Mohr, Pico, Scribner and Mayor Tarver <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSENT: None <br /> ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br /> It was moved by Mr. Pico, and seconded by Ms. Dennis, to adopt an interin <br /> Growth Management policy conditioning modifications/approvals to existing projects onl' <br /> if growth management allocations are moved from past years to the current year or int< <br /> future years. <br /> <br /> 05104193 8 <br /> <br /> <br />