CCMIN072999 - Laserfiche WebLink

also inquired if the developer would be allowed to build more houses on the golf course because it was paying for the infrastructure. He clarified that the residents would still have to pay $21,000 plus connection fees. He asked that the proposal be as specific as possible. Ms. Ayala said the $21,000 average includes on-site construction and connection costs. She reiterated that the residents are under no obligation to connect to the utilities or spend the $21,000. Cindy McGovern, 9206 Longview Drive, asked if Council were still interested in buying the San Francisco Bernal Avenue property. She believed the residents of the City of Pleasanton want a golf course, and suggested using a golf course on the San Francisco property as a way to leverage purchase of the property and annexing the land to Pleasanton. If the Happy Valley people don't want to be annexed to Pleasanton and want to preserve the rural nature of the area, the City should look at options of moving the golf course and increasing the possibility of annexing the San Francisco property. Bill Howell, 6651 Alisal Street, speaking as an individual, indicated that Craig Champion had told him that all the documentation could not be approved by October 1 st. Mr. Champion was hoping that a pre-annexation/developmentagreement could be approved by Council prior to the November election on CAPP. If it takes longer to approve the PUD plan it is acceptable. He wanted to make certain Council understood that. Craig Champion, Summerhill Homes, clarified the offer is not conditioned on a specific date as referenced in the Staff Report. Mayor Tarver indicated that in order for the City and the developers to have projects, the problems of the bypass road and infrastructure costs must be solved. He wanted it clear that the City is not requesting the developers to make this proposal. Mr. Champion also stated that developers do provide performance bonds in connection with infrastructure and that would provide assurance for construction of the bypass road. Mayor Tarver asked when Summerhill could present a completed plan for review. Mr. Champion felt it would be done in one or two weeks. The only outstanding element is the peer review of the soils. Ms. Acosta said the staff report referenced a specific date because the proposal referenced a specific date and quoted from the letter. Mr. Champion said that was an earlier draft of the proposal, the final form that was submitted to the Alisal Improvement Club and residents, does not have a date. He presented the one page proposal. He said the letter is the same as the previous proposal Pleasanton City Council 8 07/29/99 Special Meeting