My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN030299
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
CCMIN030299
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:53:17 AM
Creation date
10/11/1999 8:26:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/2/1999
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mary Roberts, 1666 Vineyard Avenue, supported the project. She felt it would be a great <br />amenity for the downtown area. She felt each application should be considered on a case by case <br />basis. This project sits next to the Barone's restaurant, which has no objections to the project and it <br />is consistent with the Pleasanton Hotel. She did not know if the Specific Plan needed to be <br />changed, but each application should be reviewed on a case by case basis. <br /> <br /> Robert Cordtz, 262 West Angela, supported the project. He felt this was the best thing that <br />could happen to the downtown area. He said with this project the Specific Plan for the downtown <br />area would finally be resolved. He hoped the room rate would be an upscale figure to compliment <br />the downtown area. He felt each application should be reviewed on a case by case basis. <br /> <br /> Wilona Perry, 4112 Stanley Boulevard, believed the application should be reviewed on a <br />case by case basis until staff has time to review and amend the Specific Plan. It is a beautiful <br />design and will compliment the downtown area. She questioned the parking. The plan calls for 39 <br />parking spaces for 38 rooms. Where will the employees park? She did not want to see three-story <br />buildings at the end of Stanley Boulevard. She suggested keeping the height limitation at 40 to 42 <br />feet to help alleviate her concem. <br /> <br /> Bruce Fiedler, Pleasanton Gardens, recommended approval of the Specific Plan or the <br />Specific Plan amendment, because of the high quality of design, Red Bear's good reputation, the <br />parking spaces that will be provided, and the fact that this project is proportionate with the <br />neighboring buildings. He felt this was a positive addition to the downtown area and wished <br />Pleasanton well on its applicationto Main Street USA. <br /> <br /> Kathleen Roney, 3896 Vineyard Avenue, opposed amending the Specific Plan. She said <br />the Specific Plan is a plan that everyone is happy with. She was not against the building, she just <br />thought it was rather large. She said she gathered thirty names saying they did not want to see such <br />a large building being put on that comer. She was amazed at the comments she received while <br />gathering the signatures. She felt Council needed to talk to the community and not just the business <br />owners. The residents want to see Pleasanton succeed but did not want the downtown area changed <br />from the original Specific Plan. <br /> <br /> Lloyd Filbert, 557 East Angela Street, felt the hotel project would change the structure of <br />the downtown area. He hoped Council would put this to the vote of the people. He loves <br />Pleasanton and would like to see it stay the way it is. <br /> <br /> Jack Hovingh, 4250 Muirwood Drive, felt it was appropriate to modify the Specific Plan. <br />He said a building of this type would add to the economic base of the downtown area. Other three <br />story buildings could have retail on the first floor, business offices on the second floor and <br />residential on the third floor. This would create a complete economic system located in the <br />downtown area. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 10 03/02/99 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.