My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN061599
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
CCMIN061599
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:53:17 AM
Creation date
8/5/1999 10:26:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/15/1999
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
It was moved by Ms. Michelotti, seconded by Vice Mayor Ayala, to introduce <br />Ordinance No. 1783, to be read by title only and waiving further reading thereof, <br />approving the application of the City of Pleasanton for prezoning, as filed under <br />Case RZ-99-03. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers - Michelotti, Pico and Vice Mayor Ayala. <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Councilmember Dennis and Mayor Tarver. <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br />Item 6c <br />Review of the Pleasanton Traffic Model and approval of 1998 Baseline Traffic <br />Report. (SR99:167) <br /> <br /> This item was continued indefinitely. <br /> <br />Item 6d <br />Matters relating to the Livermore Amador Valley Water Management Agency's <br />(LAVWMA} export pipeline alignment through Pleasanton. (SR99:159) <br /> <br /> Randall Lum presented the staff report. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti said residents had concems with the destruction of the present <br />trees. She did not have a problem with the original alignment that was proposed. She <br />asked staff to address what would happen if the new pipeline is put within the parking lot <br />area away from the trees. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lum said LAVW1VIA has indicated that in order to avoid damage to the trees <br />it will seek an expanded easement to put the new pipeline in the parking lot. The existing <br />pipeline runs directly under the trees. LAVW1VIA has indicated it believes it can place <br />the jacking pits between the trees to avoid damage to the trees and that the number of <br />jacking pits will be limited. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked how long the original lining was supposed to last? <br /> <br /> Mr. Lum said it was supposed to have lasted forty to fifty years but lasted only <br />twenty years. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti was concemed that the installation of the pipeline would have a <br />significant impact on the Stoneridge Mall and was glad to see it moved to the parking <br />area. She also had a problem with relining a pipe that has failed. She did not have a <br />problem going back to the original plan, as long as all the trees are not tom out, and the <br />disruption is kept to a minimum. She asked staff to explain how deep the pipe is placed <br />under Foothill Road. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.