Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Pico referred to a question that was raised at the Chamber of Commerce <br />luncheon which implied that the budget process had been based on the assumption that <br />the CAPP initiative would pass in November. <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta explained that the budget was put together based on two different <br />philosophies. One is that as growth slows, staff wants to be certain the community is <br />sustainable at build out. That is due to the general economy and political climate, <br />whether or not the initiative passes. Staff wants to be certain the General Fund can <br />continue to make its contributions to the capital improvement program. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico clarified that those adjustments staff has made is to put the budget in a <br />position that would be reflective of the worst case scenario if CAPP did pass and no <br />additional development was approved. <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta said it is the same effect. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis questioned whether the funds allocated for a new community park <br />was for land other than on the San Francisco property. <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta said the funds could be used for the San Francisco property or <br />somewhere else in the City. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis then asked about the allocation of the $825,000. That was originally <br />intended for purchase of land to expand the Operations Service Center. Is that land still <br />necessary? <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta said that land is definitely needed. The allocation was removed by <br />Council last year due to the political situation surrounding the Ponderosa development on <br />the Busch property. We can still address the land needs in the future. Staff is currently <br />recommending that the $825,000 be allocated to the golf course. Purchase of OSC land <br />is on the unfunded list now and can be addressed later. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked how that project could be taken off the un~mded list. <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta said that can be done at the budget hearings or during the year as <br />projects come forward, or during the annual priority setting sessions. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti then asked about removing the bulbout at Ray Street. That is a <br />$25,000 item that she would like to see in the budget. The hotel is under construction as <br />well as the ongoing construction of the Coffee Roast Express and she felt that while all <br />this construction was going on, this would be the right time to address that. She felt <br />delivery trucks and garbage trucks have a difficult time with that tuming radius. If the <br />bulbout area were moved, so there is more room southbound to eastbound, it would make <br />that tum easier. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 3 06/22/99 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />