Laserfiche WebLink
Susan Home, 2569 Wilde Avenue, a member of the Ad-Hoc Committee, expressed the <br />concerns of the residents about loud, low flying aircraft over the neighborhood and the Mohr <br />Elementary School. The school experiences loud, low flying aircraft on a daily basis. She read a <br />letter from the Airport Manager sent to the School District in 1987, where the Livermore Airport <br />was opposed to the proposed location of the school site due to potential hazards. Many residents <br />in her area are greatly concerned about the future operations of the airport. The Livermore <br />Airport is in the process of updating the Master Plan, which is an effort to improve services to <br />attract more business to the airport. She said last year operations totaled 239,000 flights but over <br />time this number could increase to 450,000 flights. An increase in the operations will result in <br />more aircraft, including jets, flying over the Mohr Elementary School and surrounding <br />neighborhoods and more congestion in the flight paths, thereby extending peak hours of <br />operation throughout the day. She said a report written by the manager of the Livermore Tower <br />states the airport traffic would probably increase with the expansion of the business parks. She <br />said the fact that no noise or curfew ordinance is being considered at this time concerns the <br />residents. The Livermore Airport web site indicates that with the large projected population <br />growth over the next fifteen years, the airport is geared to keep pace and accommodate commuter <br />airlines in the future. She asked the City Council to approve funds to hire a consultant to conduct <br />an airport study. She supported the scope of work, except she felt the data collection process of <br />the study should not be conducted at this time. She feels local pilots are making a conscious <br />effort to avoid the populated area and that any noise study performed at this time will not show <br />the reality of the problem. She suggested spending more time on getting an FAA 150 study, if <br />results from such a study could help resolve noise and safety issues. She said many letters, <br />e-mails, and telephone calls have been sent voicing concems about future operations at the <br />Livermore Airport. She encouraged the residents of Pleasanton to continue expressing their <br />concerns about the present and future operations at the Livermore Airport to the City Council <br />and Congresswoman Ellen Tauscher. She believed the airport study is a step in the fight <br />direction. She said concerned residents could e-mail her at homesusan@aol.com. She will <br />compile a database of all concerned residents so a network will be in place to address the <br />COncerns. <br /> <br /> Colleen Clement, 4025 Peregrine Way, supported the funding for the airport study. She <br />said over the years she has noticed a marked increase in the volume of flyovers, especially jet <br />aircraft. She is concemed about the health and safety issues and the quality of life. She <br />appreciated the efforts that the City is taking to address the issues surrounding the Livermore <br />Airport. <br /> <br /> Dorene Paradiso, 3168 Paseo Granada, stated the airport is a valuable asset to the <br />community, but she also has noticed an increase in airport traffic. She supported the study and <br />hoped it would address any noise or safety concerns for the future. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 8 05/04/99 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />