Laserfiche WebLink
Staples Ranch development, within the Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan and in the on-going <br />negotiations with San Francisco. The businesses have and will continue to contribute to the <br />well-being of the city through property taxes, business license fees, sales taxes, transient <br />occupancy taxes, participating in existing assessment districts such as NPID and voluntary <br />financial and manpower commitments to many non-profit organizations. A strong economic <br />climate contributes to the high quality of life of Pleasanton. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico asked if the Chamber held a similar position to converting office/commercial/ <br />industrial to school uses. <br /> <br /> Ms. Allen indicated that has not been considered. There is a different issue involved, <br />but the Chamber would look at it. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis asked if the Chamber had considered conversion of the commercial areas to <br />housing. <br /> <br /> Ms. Allen did not think the Chamber has considered that matter. <br /> <br /> Pat O'Brien, 6150 Stoneridge Mall Road/t350, representing Leisure Sports, endorsed the <br />staff recommendation and the remarks of the Chamber. He did not believe it was productive <br />to pick apart things that happened in the last ten years. The reality is many things were <br />invested, there were downturns in the market that caused practical approaches to allow <br />continuation of supporting the costs of the infrastructure everyone in Pleasanton enjoys and <br />supported the ability to do things like the library, redo the museum downtown, and the Areadot <br />Theater. In hindsight maybe Hacienda should have been half residential, but it isn't. The <br />reality is that in the Bay Area there has been a downturn in the economy. There is now <br />opportunities to draw solid employers and jobs. You can pick and choose or get serious about <br />the assets in North Pleasanton and do the best we can for the economy. Doing that will allow <br />funding for parks in areas without major loads for infrastructure. That spirit of dialogue would <br />be more productive. <br /> <br /> Ron I-Ioran, 2150 Rheem Drive/1A, has lived here since 1970 and his children have used <br />the sports facilities. He is president and chief operating officer of his company and has reached <br />as many as 200 employees. He used to sit on the Planning Commission, so he feels he knows <br />a little about the workings of this. What he does not know is the statistics that indicate that it <br />is his employees that are requiring a new softball field. He pointed out that the lights are on at <br />the School District upper field and no one is there. He believes that 50% of everyone who plays <br />on the fields is from out of town. The soccer program in Pleasanton is one of the most <br />successful in the United States and our girls and boys play in traveling leagues. The softball <br />program is an adult affair and they can pay their own way. The rent for his business takes into <br />account the infrastructure he contributed in terms of streets lights, sewers, etc. The businesses <br />are paying their way. He wants staff to address the statistics that indicate it is his employees <br />that cause the problem. Eleven of his 200 employees work in Pleasanton, the remainder are in <br />Southern California or Sacramento. Would he have to pay $100 for each of those employees <br /> <br /> 12/05/95 -11- <br /> <br /> <br />