Laserfiche WebLink
until thirty days after the ordinance was adopted. Thereafter, it could be changed to a <br />conditional use and it would take another thirty days after the second reading. There would be <br />a window where he could get his zoning certificate before a conditional use permit is required. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked if this action was final tonight or if someone could reconsider it? <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift replied that tonight was the first reading. It won't be on the Council's next <br />consent calendar since there was a split vote on it. It will be on for a second reading at the next <br />meeting. This is a matter of process and if the Council wants these types of uses to go through <br />the conditional use permit process, then those are the steps that have to be taken. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver asked if Mr. Garetz processes his application based on the ordinance being <br />approved the way it is, how long will it take him to get what he needs. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift stated four to five weeks to have the hearing in front of the Planning <br />Commission, assuming that we process it after the ordinance is adopted but not effective. Then <br />there is a fifteen day review period following that. Assuming it doesn't get appealed, it should <br />take about 45 days. If appealed, you add on another three weeks. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver asked if microbreweries were a permitted use, how long will it take? <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift stated that the zoning certificate can not officially be issued until thirty days <br />after the second reading. However, staff routinely allows property owners to move in at their <br />own risk where the possibility of a referendum is small. <br /> <br /> Mr. Garetz said no construction will occur in that thirty day window. He does have to <br />make a decision on whether to risk increasing sums of money for deposits for machinery that <br />he might not be able to use or take delivery of. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked how long he had been at this address and is this a retail operation <br />where someone could come in and purchase supplies for making their own beer at home. <br /> <br /> Mr. Garetz replied one year as of last July. He felt that the way staff had approached <br />this was that the City still had the power to come back and review the permit if there was noise, <br />having deliveries at the wrong time, producing offensive odors, etc.; this seems reasonable. It <br />seems consistent with the other businesses there. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico suggested that he talk to the Hunt family about the reasonableness of enforcing <br />some of the PUD conditions in that shopping center. He might then begin to understand why <br />Council is concerned about having these limitations, and having a review process that gives the <br />community a chance to speak up. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis did not think that the neighborhood knows of the change in the ordinance or <br />that it might impact them. At the last Council meeting, the neighbors were in attendance asking <br /> <br />09/19/95 -25- <br /> <br /> <br />