CCMIN081595 - Laserfiche WebLink

Ms. Acosta felt that there is a way the City could effectively accept delegation of these inspections, similar to Transportation Management. There has been a bill passed that will allow some of that to happen and the County could encourage or propose legislation so that only one agency is ultimately selected for a Valley-wide effort. Maybe the City could take over what the Air Quality Board is doing and just have one entity who goes out on these inspections. Mr. Withers stated that the other agencies come into the Valley and do these inspections without the City having any prior knowledge or contact with the City. He stated that the previous hou~y fee of $39.00 was set back in 1978. Ms. Michelotti stated that if the combination of services is achieved and one inspection will take the place of three inspections, it will save the people money in the long run. Mr. Withers stated that with an expert, the inspections will be done at a more rapid pace because the consultant works with other agencies and will be more familiar with the type of installations or what has occurred elsewhere in the County. That is the primary focus at this time. Ms. Mohr asked if this will become a County function versus a City function if the single inspection idea goes through? She also asked if the City was looking for someone to carry legislation to make this happen or is this something that could happen without legislation. --- Ms. Acosta stated that there are many options, but it might require a change in legislation to pick up the Air Quality Control Board fees. It was moved by Ms. Mohr, and seconded by Ms. Dennis, that Resolution No. 95-96, be adopted, authorizing the City Manager to sign the contract with Boykin Consulting Services and amending the City Master Fee Resolution to delete certain inspection fees and to add a $100/hour Hazardous Materials Administrative Fee. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Dennis, Michelotti, Mohr, and Mayor Tarver NOES: None ABSENT: Councilmember Pico ABSTAIN: None Item 6g PrOposed Cooperative Planning Process for the San Francisco Water Department - Bernal Avenue Site. (SR95:257) Ms. Acosta stated that the Alameda County Planning Commission had a workshop on 8/14/95. It was on several topics, one of which was the San Francisco project. It was an informal workshop with no action taken. Discussion did take place regarding park standards for 08/15/95 -8-