CCMIN080195 - Laserfiche WebLink

the Council should present it to the City of Pleasanton for thoughts and feelings. If the community turns it down then he felt the Council has to go back to the drawing board. If the Council approved the plan worked out with the other two parties then he felt the people of Pleasanton would approve it. He felt it was a positive process taking place. Mayor Tarvet stated that if it is developed as a consensus plan, he agreed that the residents would most likely accept it when it went through the process. The community could always call for a referendum. Mr. Gunter said that the Council would be voting on growth management as well as annexation. With that type of property and growth management, he felt the Council would have to approve some type of exemption to the growth management program. He saw this process as an all inclusive package. Ms. Mohr stated that if it goes to the Pleasanton residents for vote and if its turned down, people may think that is the end of it. She felt that wasn't the end, just that that particular plan did not work and the Council would have to go back to the negotiating table. Ms. Mohr asked Mr. Gunter if he felt that workshops were needed so that residents would be aware of how things were progressing. Mr. Gunter felt that the San Francisco item could be on every agenda and that would open it up to every person in this town. They can come down and give input at every meeting. Ms. Michelotti asked about the redline document. If Council goes through the process and the City approves the project, if a referendum petition is not fried within the time provided by law, and if the County approves a tax sharing agreement, then the annexation happens at that period of time. She asked if there is a successful referendum to that decision, what would be the end result and could it be taken back to the County at that point. Mr. Roush stated that the annexation would not proceed until the referendum period had passed. If the referendum petition were filed or the City disapproved the project, the County would then have the option of processing the refined plan. Ms. Michelotti mentioned that the staff report stated that all parties have to agree to come to the table. She asked if the County were going to give up the right that they are pursuing now, which is processing San Francisco's application through the County. Mr. Roush stated that they would be deferring that process subject to this "cooperative" process. Ms. Michelotti questioned if the County would agree to giving the control back to Pleasanton so that if the referendum takes place we would have control when that vote happens. If the vote went down and this plan wasn't acceptable, Council would be back to the table with the County to try to get another plan. 08/01/95 -15-