CCMIN080195 - Laserfiche WebLink

Item 6m PUD-90-1-3M, California Somerset Residential Development This item was continued to 8/15/95. 7, MATHERS INITIATED BY COUNCIL Item 7a Time line for annexation of San Francisco Water DiStrict Property. CLR95:43) This item was discussed as part of Item To. Item 7b On-going discussion regarding San Francisco Property. Mr. Roush stated that the Council had requested a time line for annexing the San Francisco site to Pleasanton under a proposal that would have the Planning Commission considering the final EIR and the prezoning at its August 2nd meeting and the Council considering the final EIR, prezoning and annexation application resolutions at its August 7th meeting. The staff report indicates that if the Council and the Commission were to take action on the matter, it theoretically could get to LAFCO's meeting in September. However, to get on the LAFCO's agenda, there has to be a tax sharing agreement. Currently all the real property taxes from the site go to Alameda County because it is in the unincorporated area. When a city annexes the property, there has to be an agreement reached as to how the property taxes from that property will be distributed between the County and the City. In order for LAFCO to put an annexation request on the agenda, there has to be an agreement reached between the City and County on the tax sharing issue. At this time there has been discussion but no agreement reached between Council and the Board of Supervisors. Mr. Roush continued, a "proposed cooperative planning process" was received by staff and this process was developed by the County and representatives of the San Francisco project proponents. Such a process involves particular items that the Council or the community may want to comment on. It calls for the Pleasanton and Alameda County staffs, as well as representatives from San Francisco, to review and develop a refinement to the draft specific plan that is now pending before the County. Staff believes the two critical planning issues are the intensity of development (number of units) and growth management (when would the project be built, how many units per year). Under the proposal submitted, there would be a presentation to a committee of decision makers (two from Alameda County, two from the City of Pleasanton, and two from San Francisco). That committee would decide which staff recommendations would or would not be accepted into the refined plan. Then the plan would be processed by the County, and if approved, the property would then be annexed to Pleasanton with guarantees (a preannexation agreement or a development agreement) to San Francisco. 08/01/95 -12-