Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Michelotti asked to have placed on the April 24 agenda a discussion whether she <br />could be appointed as the Council's liaison to the San Francisco process of planning the SFWD <br />property development. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico advised he would not be at the meeting on the 24th, and wanted to be involved <br />in the discussion. He feels her suggestion has merit. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti would like to open dialogue and be in with the County planners to make <br />the public aware of meetings in that process. She wants to get as much input from Pleasanton <br />residents into the County plan as possible. She does not want to end up later not having made <br />the attempt of getting Pleasanton's ideas and acceptance into the plan that may come through the <br />County through a possible referendum. She feels ignoring the situation is not in Pleasanton's <br />best interest. <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta clarified that tonight's decision is whether it should be placed on the agenda, <br />and if so, when. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico is in favor of placing it on the agenda. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver stated he is offended and upset with Ms. Michelotti's comments. He believes <br />she does not think he is reaching out to try to get a settlement. This is not the case. There <br />needs to be some guidance to what the bottom line is. Mr. Tarver does not want to give any <br />credibility to the planning process that Alameda County is conducting. He felt the rest of the <br />Council supported this position. He listed the attempts made to work with the County and <br />address their issues, but they cannot plan the development on Pleasanton's behalf. This is a non- <br />negotiable issue with Mr Tarver. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti responded to Mr. Tarver that she did not mean to offend him, but she <br />thought she understood him to say he didn't want any part in the County planning process. He <br />further reiterated that he would be an unwilling participant to the extent of having to <br />communicate his message. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis supports placing this issue on the agenda. <br /> <br /> A motion was made by Ms. Dennis, seconded by Ms. Mohr, to place on the May 2, <br />1995, agenda the request by Ms. Michelotti to be appointed as Council liaison to the SFWD <br />property planning process. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti advised that she had discussed this previously with Mr. Tarver, and <br />therefore brought the issue to the attention of the entire Council. She feels it is in the best <br />interest to pursue every avenue possible. <br /> <br />04/18/95 -22- <br /> <br /> <br />