Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Tarver wanted 28 foot streets, cobblestones in the courts, and dispersed amenities, <br />so there is more a sense of community around those recreation facilities. The park is a beautiful <br />addition, but the density issues as related to amenities within the development are separate from <br />the park issue. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti felt that so long as dressing rooms are included in the principal recreation <br />facility, she did not think adding a small recreation area elsewhere was important. She had no <br />preference for street width, however she definitely preferred some decorative treatment in the <br />court areas. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico felt the concept of reducing the street from 32 feet to 28 feet in order to give <br />four more feet in the backyards was a misconception. He referred to the site plan and described <br />why he believed that every lot will not get four more feet in the backyard. He preferred <br />expansion of the recreation area with some kind of clubhouse or meeting room to be added. He <br />is concerned about parking, which is why he wants to keep the 32 foot street. The most <br />northeast block adjacent to Stoneridge Drive consists of ten houses with no on-street parking <br />unless someone parks around the corner. Hc believed this will cause a parking problem in the <br />future. <br /> <br /> Mr. Krah indicated he and staff will look at the drawings to see how it can be redesigned <br />to get every unit within a reasonable proximity of parking spaces; review the decorative paving <br />in the court yards; add a dressing room in one recreation area; determine whether to have one <br />recreation area or two; and come back at the next meeting. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Mr. Pico, seconded by Ms. Dennis, to continue this item for staff <br />and the developer to modify the plan. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers - Ayala, Dennis, Michelotti, Pico, and Mayor Tarver <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br /> This item was then continued to January 7, 1997 to allow the developer to modify <br />the plan. <br /> <br /> There was a break at 9:15 p.m. <br /> <br /> The meeting was reconvened at 9:21 p.m. <br /> <br /> 11 12/03/96 <br /> <br /> <br />