My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN092496
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
CCMIN092496
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:53:55 AM
Creation date
5/13/1999 11:15:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Mayo indicated the planning group was looking at that. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr referred to complaints about graf~ti and litter at current park and ride facilities <br />and asked how that would be addressed? <br /> <br /> Ms. Mayo stated the park and ride lot in question is under private contract for cleanup. <br />When the graffiti problem was reported, the BART operations maintenance crews addressed the <br />problem. The extension track is now under construction control and the contractors are taking <br />care of graffiti removal on the extension. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis asked how much money has been spent so far in preparing for the west <br />station? How much would the ramps cost? <br /> <br /> Ms. Mayo said about $5 million has been spent on design, foundations and track <br />preparation. About $14 million has been spent on purchase of the property on both sides. <br /> <br /> Mr. Delander believed the ramps would cost $15-20 million. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mayo invited Council to participate in the test train ride on October 2. <br /> <br /> Neal Johnson supported the west BART station as the second top priority for the region. <br />A lot of money has already been spent to put the station there. Highway 84, on the other hand, <br />is a long work in progress and will take $100 to $200 million to bring it to a point where it will <br />successfully divert traffic from the 580/680 interchange. He believed the phasing of the <br />Highway 84 project was important. If Livermore does work first at the 580 interchange, it will <br />cause problems on the Pleasanton side. He believed it was necessary to have a four lane road <br />between Pigeon Pass and the Isabel extension before an interchange is completed at 680. <br />Additionally, it is necessary to improve 680 south of Highway 84. All of this will cost <br />considerably more than the west Pleasanton BART station. <br /> <br /> Robert Allen, 223 Donner Avenue, Livermore, indicated the first proposal for the west <br />BART station included a bridge across 1-580 so people could walk across the freeway. In the <br />new proposal, it does not appear a person can walk from one parking lot to the other or from <br />Dublin to the Stoneridge shopping area. He urged Council to insist on a pedestrian walkway <br />for future plans. <br /> <br /> Gary Schwagaerle supported a BART extension to Livermore with high density <br />residential near the station. In the early 1990's he was told BART cost about $40 million a mile <br />and by 1994, it was $50 million a mile. He did not understand this because inflation has been <br />low and land costs and manufacturing costs have gone down. He felt there was built in <br />obsolescence; smaller tracks do not mesh with existing rail lines. He believed the commuter <br />train from Stockton to San Jose is $10 million. In the age of the Internet, it is unbelievable that <br />BART staff cannot make its computers talk to each other. <br /> <br /> 09/24/96 <br /> -18- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.