CCMIN092496 - Laserfiche WebLink

It was moved by Ms. Dennis, seconded by Mr. Pico, that a footnote be added to the timeline that explains that the CalTrans study will be submitted at the point when it is clear an initiative will not go forward. The roll C~I vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers - Dennis, Mohr, Pico, and Mayor Tarvet NOES: None ABSENT: Councilmember Michelotti ABSTAIN: None Item 5c Transportation Priorities including West Dublin/P!easanton BART station, 1-580/680 Direct Connector Flyover. and Highway 84. (SR96:287) Item 5d DiSCuSsion of L0C~ll Match for 1-580/680 Direct Connector Flyover Project and Priority Funding for Tri-Valley Transportation Pro_i ects. (SR96:287) Item 5e Approval of Freeway Agreement for 1-580/680 Flyover Project. (SR96:287) Randall Lum presented the staff report, which covered items 5c, d and e. Ms. Michelotti referred to the deadline for payment of the local match funds and the payment schedule for reimbursement from regional fees. TVTC has already committed the first regional fees to a fund for this project. At the time the payment becomes due, any money that is in the regional pool will be deducted and the prorations will be done again. It may not be necessary for Pleasanton to pay all of the cost of the project. Mr. Lum indicated the hope that TVTC will get the fee in place and generates the fees quickly enough that Pleasanton does not have to pay anything. Matt Sullivan asked if approval of funds from Pleasanton would be based on keeping the Stoneridge off ramp for any fiyovers from eastbound or westbound 580 to southbound 680, or has that been addressed? Mr. Lum said that was not a condition for the funding, but was a condition of the freeway agreement that CalTrans was requesting the City to approve. That would remain an open question for the future. CalTrans believes there is not enough room for a flyover from 580 to come down quickly enough onto 680 to allow access to Stoneridge Drive. As staff found on 09/24/96 -13-