Laserfiche WebLink
voluntary discharges as one speaker suggested. He spoke to the comments about losing the view <br />of Mt. Diablo and reminded Council about the mature trees that already exist on the site and that <br />there are four and five story buildings on Hopyard Road. The Providian building also exceeds <br />the height of the two story portion of the proposed Thoratec building. He referred to the <br />similarities in the Providian and PeopleSoft applications and to the questions regarding parking. <br />He referred to the flyer sent by Mr. Garrett to the neighborhood and pointed out what he <br />considered to be misleading and incomplete statements. He indicated Mr. Garrett no longer cites <br />the Bank of America opposition, because it is neutral to the project. Mr. Garrett no longer cites <br />the alevaluation of his property, since he has spoken to real estate agents who have said a retail <br />and restaurant operation would do more to devalue the property than the Thoratec application. <br />Mr. Hirst referred to the statement that there was a petition signed by over a hundred people, <br />including some children, but the signatures were not presented. Trustworthiness was mentioned <br />several times by Mr. Garrett; Mr. Hirst asked if Council trusted city staff, the Fire Department, <br />the Planning Commission, FDA, etc. He also indicated the figures for the employees were <br />accurate in the staff report. Finally, Mr. Hirst showed a few slides of the proposed building and <br />views of the surrounding area in Pleasanton, as well as slides of the existing Thoratec plant in <br />Berkeley and the surrounding area there. Mr. Hirst thanked Council for its endurance and urged <br />approval of the project and to allow development to start at the earliest possible date. <br /> <br /> The mayor closed the public hearing. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis requested Chris Boykin to address the hazardous materials aspect of the <br />application. <br /> <br /> Chris Boykin, hazardous materials consultant for the City, indicated a complete list of <br />chemicals has been given to her. Some are classified as toxic, highly toxic, flammable, <br />combustible, or irritants, but there are no explosives, radioactives, or unstable reactives. Those <br />materials are not unlike the chemicals typically used in R & D facilities, pharmaceutical or <br />biotech type companies. She believed the manufacturing operation was on a very small scale. <br />There is a maximum of two 55-gallon drums of a flammable or toxic material. That will be <br />used in a room with full controls including automatic fire sprinklers. The ventilation <br />requirements include directing the ventilation to a treatment system, like a scrubber system, so <br />all fumes are captured. There is emergency power, alarms, etc. and is very well controlled. <br />In addition, the Uniform Fire Code must be followed, which includes administrative controls for <br />preparing a hazardous materials management plan, which has been done. There is a description <br />of emergency response procedures and an emergency response team. They have training <br />procedures for their employees regarding handling the materials. The Fire Department has an <br />extensive plan checking and inspection process before and after occupancy. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis asked if there was anything that warranted an evacuation plan for a <br />neighborhood. <br /> <br />09/03/96 -18- <br /> <br /> <br />