Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Pico asked if Alameda County or San Francisco continues with the development <br />process during this period of time or do they hold off on any actions. <br /> <br /> Mr. Roush assumed they would move ahead in the planning. The tolling only applies <br />to the filing of lawsuits and/or statute of limitations, not a tolling on processing of further <br />applications. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis asked how the tolling agreement affects the environmental document. If <br />Pleasanton approves a plan, does that nullify the EIR certified by the County? <br /> <br /> Mr. Roush indicated that would be an important element of the preannexation agreement <br />in terms of undoing the County approvals, so that there are not two environmental impact <br />reports. <br /> <br /> Mr. Dennis asked what was the time frame for the preannexation agreement. Would it <br />be discussed before the tolling agreement expires? <br /> <br /> Mr. Roush indicated it would be. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti believed that if San Francisco is to continue to work with the City of <br />Pleasanton, that the County approvals will be voided. She does not think the City of San <br />Francisco will spend large sums to continue development under the County approval if they <br />intend to continue to work with the City of Pleasanton for a plan that will be acceptable and for <br />annexation. There was a unanimous Council vote on Alternative 5 and she wanted to know what <br />was happening with that plan. <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta indicated the meetings have continued with the City and County of San <br />Francisco and with Peter Calthorpe. Because of various circumstances, such as the Pleasanton <br />General plan hearings and a new child for Mr. Calthorpe, the meetings have been put <br />temporarily on a back burner. Mr. Calthorpe has continued to work on the design guidelines. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti felt it was important to have discussion on what Council expects regarding <br />the various agreements and the plans. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver wanted a closed session before continuing to discuss how to proceed. He just <br />wanted a status report for the community and to hear any public comments before going into a <br />closed session. <br /> <br /> Kay Ayala, 45 15 Gatetree Circle, indicated she had asked Rick Nelson if San Francisco <br />will proceed to process further applications with the County if Pleasanton enters into the tolling <br />agreement. Mr. Nelson indicated it would not. <br /> <br />08/07/96 <br /> -11- <br /> <br /> <br />