Laserfiche WebLink
The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Michelotti and Mohr <br />NOES: Councilmembers Dennis, Pico and Mayor Tarver <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico indicated it was 11: 00 p.m. and unless staff needs further specific direction for <br />a legal review, he suggested adjourning. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver felt that if discussion is continued to August 5, it defeats the purpose of <br />getting legal advice. We are still going over the same issues, making the same motions, and <br />until there is firm direction to staff, how can there be a legal review. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Ms. Mohr, seconded by Ms. Dennis, to continue discussions even <br />though it takes the Council beyond our normal time for adjournment. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico felt Council makes bad decisions when meetings go past 11:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver suggested continuing to tomorrow night. <br /> <br /> A substitution motion was made by Ms. Michelotti, seconded by Ms. Denn|.% to <br />continue the discussion to tomorrow night at 6:00 p.m. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarvet was willing to start early and wanted there to be motions and votes on issues <br />without continued debate. That can take hours. We are doing this to give each Councilmember <br />the opportunity to be on record for or against something. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked what other items needed legal review. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver felt the issues for legal review were: the urban growth boundaries, the <br />housing cap, the need for growth management findings, any obligation to provide a certain level <br />of development in the Corridor, and a review of the proposed resolutions. <br /> <br />07/15/96 <br /> - 25 - <br /> <br /> <br />