CCMIN071596 - Laserfiche WebLink

Ms. Mohr would rather encourage the dedication than have the property divided into large lots and have arroyos retained as private land, when having access to an arroyo could complement the trail system. Ms. Dennis felt this was mixing the issue gross developable acreages with how Council is judging the value of the PUD and its amenities. Ms. Michelotti asked if Ms. Dennis would support stating the arroyos are not to be counted as part of the residential gross developable acres; then take out the rest of the proposed wording. Ms. Michelotti mended her original motion, seconded by Ms. Denn[% to modify page 114, last paragraph, sentence 3, to delete "whether the arroyo is proposed for dedication or not." with the remainder of the paragraph to remain the same as shown on Exhibit 4. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers - Dennis, Michelotti, Mohr, Pico, and Mayor Tarver NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Vineyard Corridor Ms. Dennis referred to the list of land use designations and asked in which category wineries, restaurants, and other possibilities are included. Mr. Swift indicated those uses are covered in the text. Wineries are allowed in agriculture zones, bed and breakfasts are allowed in residential zones, restaurants are allowed as a component of wineries in the agriculture zone, but a restaurant not in conjunction with a winery operation would not be allowed in the agriculture zone. A commercial designation could be added to the Vineyard Corridor if desired. Mr. Tarver wanted numbers of acres for each use in that area. Mr. Swift indicated staff had designated only the uses for the specific plan area so that the uses can be located wherever appropriate once all the information has been gathered. Ms. Miehelotti indicated the clarification motion regarding the Vineyard Corridor took place on July 9 and the minutes are not available. She asked the Mayor if any changes to Exhibit 4 could be deferred until the minutes are available. 07/15/96 - 22 -