Laserfiche WebLink
development are becoming more defined and there are different expectations. He did not want <br />to set 127 units or 480 units. He has heard enough to believe that if any number is set, that is <br />what will be expected to be built. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico indicated his big concern was there have been a number of studies looking at <br />this and he felt the real core of the issue was the amount of residential development required to <br />provide the urban infrastructure necessary. All these other alternatives have been looked at and <br />people come back saying the other alternatives don't work and they want houses there. He <br />would rather see it not be developed. The real difficulty is infrastructure costs. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift indicated there are a number of ways of looking at the question of minimum <br />units to support infrastructure. Staff usually wants an area to be self-supporting in terms of <br />infrastructure, but that is not necessarily the way the overall plan could be developed. The City <br />can decide it wants Vineyard Avenue improved, whether relocated or in its existing location, but <br />that improvement should be an overall City cost similar to the cost the City will bear to complete <br />Foothill Road or some other major streets. The City can build into its fee structure for the <br />entire City revenue to do certain of the infrastructure for this area, whether it be water, sewer <br />or road systems. The area may not have to be totally self-supporting and infrastructure could <br />be paid for by development throughout the entire community in a fashion that meets legal tests <br />for providing backbone infrastructure for the City. For instance, the Water Department would <br />like to see the Ruby Hill water system connected to the City's current system. The key is <br />Council needs to establish ultimately what is the satisfactory land use product type and amount. <br />Simply because the west end of the Corridor is more easily served by sewer and water may not <br />be the best answer that it gets the most density and the east end gets nothing. The answer could <br />be that they share the density and the City share some of the cost of the infrastructure. With <br />the kind of direction from Council tonight, staff will not come back with one plan, but would <br />instead present several options. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver wanted to repeat Mr. Pieo's original motion with the modification of Ms. <br />Michelotti's substitute motion adding a study area concept. He wanted the essence of the Fertile <br />Crescent concepts, the other uses suggested by Ms. Dennis, and putting that into a study area <br />to come back with options from staff. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Mr. Pico, seconded by Ms. Denn[% to place the Vineyard Avenue <br />Corridor into a study area and that a staff generated Specific Plan be prepared that wffi <br />create an attractive gateway to the Livermore Valley wine country~ preserve substantial <br />open space in the Vineyard Corridor, create a scenic road entry into the wine country, <br />encourage planting vineyards, and implement a wine-country architectural-design theme <br />throughout the Corridor, with uses to include wineries, bed and breakfasts, restaurants, <br />and other compatible uses. <br /> <br />07/01/96 <br /> -26- <br /> <br /> <br />