CCMIN061396 - Laserfiche WebLink

Sharen Heinz, 761 Wall Street, Livermore, reminded Council that the City came to the Vineyard Avenue residents and asked them to annex to the City. She believed promises were made that they would be allowed to develop. They have worked for six years and spent a lot of money on this process. She felt they have lost rights instead of gaining rights. They were not allowed to be on the General Plan Steering Committee. She was opposed to the 4/5ths vote requirement and felt it was unconstitutional. Mr. Tarver asked for clarification on the formation of the Committee. Wayne Rasmussen indicated the Steering Committee was appointed by the Council and consisted of residents of Pleasanton. The Vineyard Corridor had not been annexed at the time of formation of the Steering Committee. There were no restrictions on membership on the subcommittees. Christine Bourg, 4512 Second Street, indicated she had served on the General Plan Steering Committee and was sorry to hear that some people disagree with the recommendations and are critical of it. There was a strong commitment to seek out and support the general interests of the community and to encourage consensus. There were three methods of encouraging participation: town meetings, subcommittees, and a general assembly of citizens. Later a survey was added. All this presented a clear view of the desires of the average citizen of Pleasanton. In all cases, the Steering Committee listened to the views of citizens and subcommittees to produce a General Plan to balance the interests of all the residents. A small minority of citizens with special interests or different political views have combined to give an illusion of a lack of community support or dissatisfaction for the conclusions of the Steering Committee. She did not believe there was such a feeling. She believed the Steering Committee's recommendations are a reflection of the communities desires as expressed in the methods of contact. This is a compromise position. Ms. Bourg felt it was important for Council to vote on the General Plan and then send it to the general public for ratification. She thinks the special interests are trying to influence Council not to put the Plan to a vote because the general public will not support their position. George Gunter, 1805 Greenwood Road, also served on the General Plan Steering Committee. He felt it was time for him to speak up. He has listened to other Committee members complain of unfairness. That is because they did not get what they wanted. There were fifteen people on the Committee and there were some people who continually tried to delay the process. He felt this was because they were not getting what they wanted and hoped to continue to lobby for the Council' s vote. He felt some were against allowing the citizens to vote on issues because they know the citizens will not support them. There has been a lot of growth in the past and some have made a lot of money. The residents have changed and no longer want that growth and feel the need to protect the city as it is. He referred to the comments of Rick Bentley, felt his comments were correct about some having fixed ideas, and believed that Mr. Bentley was one of those people. Mr. Gunter also said Mr. Bentley did not attend all meetings and left before the end of the meeting at others. Mr. Gunter also expressed his disappointment 06/13/96 -9-