CCMIN030596 - Laserfiche WebLink

j. Adopt Resolution No. 9(>-23, a Resolution of Intention to approve an amendment to the contract between the Board of Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement System and the City Council of the City of Pleasanton regarding Fourth Level 1959 Sttrvivor's Benefit for local fire members; introduce Ordinance No. 1677, to be read by title only and waiving further reading thereof, authorizing an amendment to the City's Contract with the Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) to provide the "Fourth Level 1959 Survivors" Option to the City's Fire Public Safety Employees; and approve the Agreement Between City and PERS to Pool 1959 Survivors Benefit Assets and Liabilities. (SR96:69) k. Accept the Information Report of the Director of Parks and Community Services reviewing and analyzing nonresident fees for recreational services and facilities. (IR96: 14) 1. Oppose Assembly Bill 2084, and authorize the Mayor to send the attached draft letter to the appropriate legislators; support Senate Bill 1590 and direct staff to communicate the City' s position to the appropriate legislators and other interested parties; and authorize the Mayor, Councilmembers, and staff to participate in League of Cities-sponsored efforts supporting the bill. (SR96:65) m. PUD-81-30-32M/PIJD-85-8-13M, Prudential Insurance Company of America. This item was moved to Item 6g. (SR96: 17) Ed Churka questioned Items 4f and 4k. Randall Lure indicated Item 4f was a bike path that had been in the Trail Master Plan for some time. This action is only a grant application and there is still a lot of work to be done. The neighborhoods will be notified and will have an opportunity to give input on the project. Dolores Bengtson explained that Item 4k is an information report on existing policies on charging nonresident fees and does not propose any new charges. Jerry Lemm spoke in favor of Item 4k. Steve Sherman, 4751 Sutter Gate Avenue, represented the Chamber of Commerce Economic Development Committee. He referred to the proposal to impose a fee on employers for business sector impacts on park facilities. Ms. Acosta indicated that item is scheduled for the agenda on 3/19/96. Mr. Sherman wanted to point out that the Chamber of Commerce was against any new tax or fee imposed on busin.esses and felt it would have a negative impact on drawing businesses to the area. If there is a need for additional park facilities, he asked Council to allow the 03105196 -3-