My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN080597
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
CCMIN080597
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:53:36 AM
Creation date
5/10/1999 5:59:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/5/1997
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
will receive with the Dougherty Valley developer pursuant to the set~ement agreement. Is the <br />recommendation from staff to pursue the agreements? <br /> <br /> Mr. Lum said whether Bishop Ranch pays or not remains to be seen. But through the <br />reimbursement agreements, Pleasanton could receive from the neighbors to the north, <br />reimbursements for the interchanges that were improved along 1-580. The income could be used <br />to credit Hacienda property owners against the regional fee or against future local fees. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked which jurisdictions were included to the north. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lum said Contra Costa County and the Cities of Dublin, San Ramon and Danville. <br /> Mayor Tarver asked if these communities were adopting this fee. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lum thought yes. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarvet asked if this fee could give Pleasanton credit for what has been done. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lum said it would give credit for the improvements that have been done at <br />Hacienda, Hopyard and Santa Rita and those interchanges that have been done by NPID. The <br />City is seeking reimbursement, as has been done with the City of Dublin. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver asked how is this determined? <br /> <br /> Mr. van Gelder said agreements would be negotiated based on the percentage of new <br />traffic growth that would use the interchanges. The agreements would be based on the <br />agreement made with Dougherty Valley. He suggested the TVTC fee would be effective when <br />all jurisdictions have adopted the fee. If Pleasanton delays adopting the fee until reimbursement <br />agreements are signed, there will be no fee. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver asked if there was a provision in the Dougherty Valley agreement that if <br />all the agencies agree there will be a regional fee. <br /> <br /> Mr. van Gelder said the Dougherty Valley set~ement agreement does have a provision <br />that the agencies will collect a regional fee. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver said a solution would be to get the agencies to agree on the fee. It would <br />not be in Pleasanton's best interest to delay agreeing on the fee if the City wanted to receive <br />regional fees from Dougherty Valley. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis said there is no local traffic fee presently. She suggested setting a local fee <br />to put Pleasanton on a more level playing field with the other jurisdictions. The fee could be <br />adjusted lower or higher to make it level. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 08/05/97 <br />Minutes 8 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.