My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN012197
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
CCMIN012197
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:53:36 AM
Creation date
5/10/1999 5:20:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/21/1997
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
only 24 homes; the other half will be paid for from the course revenues. The plan with 24 lots <br />works. If Council wants to eliminate all traffic on the small section of Alisal Street, how will <br />you pay for the million dollar road extension suggested from the Spotorno property to the golf <br />course? You can pay for it by reserving on the course six extra lots to be sold off when the City <br />needs to pay for the road. The value of the lots will keep up with the increasing road costs. <br />Council could increase the number of lots from 24 to 30 or 36 and use the revenue for other <br />City facilities. Council was elected on a program of slower growth to preserve the ambiance <br />and quality of life of Pleasanton. This is an opportunity to add a great facility for the children <br />and golfing enthusiasts. Ms. Dennis had indicated she was not willing to have an unlimited <br />number of housing units to pay for this, but he was certain 24 was an acceptable number of <br />units. To get the additional funds for the road improvements, he did not feel a few more homes <br />was a deal-breaker. No other development proposal would benefit the City like this will and he <br />encouraged Council to review both plans. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti clarified that her concern has always been for the financing and risks of <br />this project. She has never said approval of additional units is the way to go. <br /> <br /> Kellen Aura, 770 Happy Valley Road, supported the golf course with reservations. He <br />did not think all the property owners supported one acre parcels. There is more foot, equestrian <br />and bicycle traffic on Happy Valley on the weekends than car traffic. The residents know the <br />road and golfers may not. He worries about taking away the multiple use of the road due to <br />safety concerns. He supported the bypass road as the driveway to the golf course. <br /> <br /> Leslie Wolf, 6028 Alisal Street, wants to keep the area as it is. She wanted the use of <br />Alisal and Happy Valley to be very temporary and believed the bypass road should be built first <br />so all construction traffic could use that for golf course development. She referred to <br />discussions regarding water and sewer connection and wanted to know where the pipeline would <br />go. <br /> <br /> Roger Smith, 6344 Alisal Street, indicated he was concerned about the process and felt <br />the people who attend meetings are the ones who will make money on this and those who don't <br />attend the meetings are the residents with school children or elderly who don't understand the <br />importance of this. He believed the majority of the community does not want one-acre zoning, <br />but should stay with the General Plan two acre designation. The traffic levels are a good <br />example of how this process has gone astray. There will be a bypass road with just as much <br />traffic being carried on the Happy Valley loop and that is not at all what the community wants. <br />The process must represent the community as a whole. There is a proposal for a golf course <br />committee and to have a specific plan. He supports both options. Developing a specific plan <br />will be a long term process. How is the golf course committee going to address some of the <br />issues, such as location of the bypass road or whether there will be a bypass road, the location <br />of the main buildings, access to the course, etc. He felt those were questions for the specific <br />plan with input from the community. He felt there should be a different kind of golf course <br />committee, which has community representation and plans more than the golf course. He <br />proposed a steering committee comprised of members of the golf course committee, who should <br /> <br /> 17 1/21/97 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.