Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Michelotti asked if he was suggesting that there not be any up front costs and that <br />the balance would be amortized over a twenty year period of time. <br /> <br /> Mr. Smith said that is correct. He said approximately $20,000 in hookup costs are <br />needed to be paid to Zone 7, DSRSD, and to the contractor who installs the pipes and water <br />meters. He said many residents are not in a position to pay this $20,000 and suggested a benefit <br />district be set up to amortize the costs over a twenty year period. A benefit district that would <br />be administered by the City, where the City pays for the infrastructure and hookup costs and <br />then charges the residents over a twenty year period. The second option would be to defer the <br />costs until such time as the property is sold. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked if the costs provided by the benefit district would accrue interest? <br /> <br /> Mr. Smith said yes, and it would allow people to participate. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala asked if he felt City water and sewer to the Happy Valley area was an asset <br />and if it would improve the value of the properties? She understood he agreed with staff's <br />recommendation on page 23, alternative 37 <br /> <br /> Mr. Smith said yes. He agreed with equal cost sharing. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked if, under his proposal, someone that was 75 feet away from the <br />water line would be subsidizing someone one-half mile away? <br /> <br /> Mr. Smith said the major cost is hooking up to DSRSD/Zone 7 and paying for the <br />infrastructure. He felt the residents would not feel they were subsidizing anyone else. If it <br />became a problem, the residents could pay for their own length of pipe. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala asked if the property owners understood the $40,000 would not be going into <br />the City's General Fund, but would be paid to DSRSD and Zone 7. <br /> <br /> Mr. Smith felt there may be some confusion on that issue. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti felt certain issues needed to be addressed regarding the amount to be paid, <br />how long it would amortized, and who would be required to pay the balance. <br /> <br /> Mr. Smith said the proposal is a cap of $20,000. If legal requirements prevent this he <br />asked Council to look at staff's recommendations to make it feasible for the community to <br />participate. In order to make this feasible, do not require any lump sum payment up front. He <br />would like Council to support the Planning Commission's recommendation and put a cap on the <br />amount. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti would like to know who would pick up the additional cost. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 9 06/16/98 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />