My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN040798
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
CCMIN040798
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:53:27 AM
Creation date
2/3/1999 4:08:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/7/1998
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Swift said only if a sale were to occur before the recordation of the final map. <br /> <br /> Ms. Frost reiterated again the reason she was asking for the recordation is that the <br />potential buyers wanted assurance that there would be three parcels. <br /> <br /> Roger Smith, 6344 Alisal Street, said Ms. Frost has been a good friend to the community <br />for many years. She is being forced by circumstances to leave this community. Her request <br />seems very reasonable. This is a simple two party transaction and the potential buyer of the <br />property would like to be assured that they will be able to build two additional homes with the <br />least amount of uncertainty and administrative inconvenience and expense. He asked that <br />Council not adopt staff's recommendation, but approve Ms. Frost's requests supported by the <br />Planning Commission. <br /> <br /> Being there was no further public testimony, the public hearing was closed. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis asked if a wildlife study would precede the grading plan? <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift referred to Condition No. 8, which said staff wished to see a hydrological and <br />biological study done to ensure that subsequent grading will in fact deliver the flood flows to the <br />channel that is developed by Greenbriar and leave the existing channel as close to what currently <br />exists. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis felt there was considerable uncertainty how the final map will look and how <br />the final connections would be made. She felt the property might not be right for what is <br />proposed but that it was going in the right direction. There is no problem in dividing the <br />property into three lots, just the timing and if the property is sold to someone else. She <br />wondered if there was a way to write an alternate condition that would satisfy Ms. Frost. She <br />felt uncomfortable going with the Planning Commission's recommendations. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti had no problem with the sale guaranteeing three lots; it would be whether <br />the property would be sold to different people in the future. The recommendation is that no <br />building permit be issued presently. She had hoped the prospective buyers would testify tonight. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala felt uncomfortable in getting into negotiations between the buyer and seller. <br />She wanted the infrastructure put in and paid for by the people who should pay for it. She was <br />afraid that other properties would ask for the same thing. The area is zoned for three lots. She <br />could not quite understand the Planning Commission's thinking. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver asked if the Planning Commission's recommendations were inconsistent <br />with the other conditions proposed by staff?. For example if Condition 3 were to be changed to <br />not restrict the recordation of the PUD plan, would that prevent the PUD plan from lapsing if <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 4/7/98 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> 12 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.