My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN030398
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
CCMIN030398
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:53:27 AM
Creation date
2/3/1999 3:59:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/3/1998
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Dennis asked if the guns could be sold in a jurisdiction that did not have restrictions. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti also wanted to clarify that for the public. <br /> <br /> Mr. Roush said yes, the guns proposed to be banned for sale could be purchased in <br />jurisdictions that had not adopted such an ordinance. He believed Dublin had not yet adopted <br />such an ordinance. <br /> <br /> Vice Mayor Dennis asked for public testimony. <br /> <br /> Mike Bordenave, 3262 Northampton, asked that the research on the guns be done before <br />an ordinance was adopted. If this ordinance is adopted, where would people go if they wanted <br />to transfer ownership. He said the people of Pleasanton act responsibly and behave accordingly. <br />He believed there were far more important issues to address than this ordinance. <br /> <br /> Pat Carroll, 3168 Paseo Granada, said he was dismayed that Council did not listen to the <br />voice of the people against this ordinance. He believed the ordinances were not in the best <br />interest of Pleasanton. He felt that the ordinances should go to the vote of the people. He urged <br />Council to reconsider this matter, put aside its own personal opinions and agendas, and put the <br />ordinances to the vote of the people. He asked for clarification on the number of handguns <br />being banned. The Valley Times newspaper said sixty-five guns were being banned. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis said nineteen manufacturers with sixty-five different models would be <br />banned. <br /> <br /> Daryl Davis, 2392 Sutter Avenue, g9, Santa Clara, said he was a law enforcement <br />firearms instructor in Santa Clara County. He is a veteran of law enforcement for almost two <br />decades. He said the term Saturday Night Specials and the law originated in statues of the post <br />reconstruction era in the South that were enacted in order to disarm African Americans. He did <br />not support the concept or laws of Saturday Night Specials. He felt the proposed ordinance was <br />unclear, ambiguous and undefined. If the ordinance is adopted there will be challenges. He said <br />there are firearms that are used by the police department that should fall under this ordinance. <br />But the ordinance specifically allows police officers to buy Saturday Night Specials. He said <br />the free legal service being offered cost the County of Santa Clara $250,000. He felt the money <br />could be better spent on after school programs and a youth center. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked if he represented a group. <br /> <br /> Mr. Davis said he was invited here by some of the residents. <br /> <br /> Roy Fansler, 3028 Florence, San Jose, asked how many Saturday Night Specials had <br /> exploded in someone's face? He said guns do not go off by themselves. He felt it would be <br /> better to educate the children on the use and safety of guns. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 3/03/98 <br />Minutes 19 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.