CCMIN021798 - Laserfiche WebLink

were offered to provide as an option for the purchasers, even though it believes the in-lieu fee is all that Greenbriar is required to do. The secondary units should not be conditioned as to whom they could be rented to. This would not be acceptable to the buyers. He addressed the other issues brought up: 1) the unsafe curve - an independent study was done by TJKM and both alternatives were deemed safe alignments; 2) the compensation questions raised - Greenbriar has met with all those involved. Condition number six stated that all issues had to be worked out prior to tentative map approval and it was Greenbriar's intent to do so. It is Greenbriar's intent to compensate property owners fai~y, but it cannot put an agreement in writing until we know where the road will go; 3) the setback behind Ms. Perri's house was being worked on to be increased; 4) the road along 871 Sycamore would be kept as a rural nature with no curb and gutter, the design guidelines require split rail fencing; 5) the width of the lots were not changed, just the depth. This was due to the alignment of road A; and finally 6) the addresses on Sycamore Road would remain the same. Ms. Ayala asked where the concept of the secondary units came from? Mr. Constanzo said the concept of detached units came from discussions with the Planning Commission as to how to offer additional affordable housing. Right from the start it was made clear that the people on the north did not want any detached units and that is why the condition that is proposed is proposed in such a manner. Ms. Dennis mentioned plan three and four had the detached units in-house. Which plans could accommodate detached units? Mr. Constanzo said it depended which lot was involved. Setbacks, FAR and design issues would have to be worked out with the Planning Department. The project could be approved with the requirement that the details be worked out with the Planning Department. Mayor Tarver asked for an explanation of "if the City Council is not prepared to initiate condemnation proceedings for all such parcels, the Planning Department and the City Council shall determine whether the tentative map nonetheless conforms to the PUD development plan in order for the tentative map to be approved." Mr. Roush said the Council has expressed resistance from time to time about initiating condemnation for public improvements. The concept is if the tentative map were to come forward before the private property was bought and Council was not ready to initiate condemnation proceedings, then the Council and/or Planning Commission would have to decide whether the plan, without the public improvements, still substantially conformed to the PUD. If it did not, then the tentative map could not go forward. Ms. Michelotti asked what the Council would need to do in regards to the secondary units and whether Council could limit how many secondary units were built? Pleasanton City Council 2/17/98 Minutes 18