My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 88197
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
RES 88197
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/4/2012 4:29:00 PM
Creation date
12/2/1999 12:05:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/3/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> <br /> ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 88-197 <br /> <br /> RESOLUTION APPROVING PLEASANTON'S PARTICIPATION IN LOCAL <br /> SHARE OF MEASURE B 1-580/I-680 INTERCHANGE PROJECT <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the voters of Alameda County approved a 1/2 cent sales <br /> tax increase to fund specific street and freeway <br /> improvement projects; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Alameda County Transportation Authority has been <br /> given the responsibility of seeing that the funds raised <br /> from the increased sales tax are spent according to the <br /> terms approved by the voters; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, one of the projects to be constructed with the funds was <br /> improvement to the 1-580/I-680 Interchange at a total <br /> estimated cost of $54 million, of which $10 million or <br /> 18.5 percent is to come from local sources; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the first phase of the 1-580/I-680 Interchange could be <br /> constructed at this time in order to provide earlier <br /> usage of the west to north ramp from 1-580 to 1-680 at a <br /> substantial savings over later costs; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the first phase of the 1-580/I-680 Interchange has an <br /> estimated cost of $2.054 million of which $380,000 must <br /> be paid from local funds; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, when the voters approved Measure B, they approved an <br /> allocation of monies to the cities and county for local <br /> transportation purposes as well as allotment of monies <br /> to specific projects and also approved a local share <br /> cost for certain projects including the 1-580/I-680 <br /> Interchange; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, it is generally not appropriate to take Measure B funds <br /> from the cities or county to help pay for the local <br /> share of Measure B specific projects since this is an <br /> additional allocation of Measure B funds above that <br /> contemplated by the voters; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, by advancing money for this first phase of the <br /> 1-580/I-680 Interchange, appreciable savings can be made <br /> in overall construction costs and earlier service <br /> achieved, thus making it a special case; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, all four agencies, including Alameda County, ask that <br /> the Alameda County Transportation Authority reconsider <br /> the existing policy which prohibits the use of federal <br /> and/or state funds to pay the local costs of future <br /> Measure B projects; and <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.