My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
09
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
091807
>
09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2007 12:20:11 PM
Creation date
9/14/2007 12:20:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/18/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
09
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
recommends against any additional outward extensions of BART beyond Livermore. <br />Instead, the Plan recommends that BART be complemented with a larger regional <br />express network serving longer-distance trips. <br />The type of facility that serves this longer distance trip is currently the Altamont <br />Commuter Express. The draft report recognizes the need to incrementally separate <br />passenger rail rights-of-way from freight rights-of-way and over time develop a higher <br />speed, express regional rail network including investment in modern, standard-gauge <br />equipment. <br />Regional Rail in the Tri-Valley <br />The Draft Report Summary describes two Regional Rail alternatives in the I-680/Tri- <br />Valley Corridor absent High Speed Rail: <br />• Alternative 1 -Two station BART extension in median of I-580 near Greenville <br />Road; paired with upgrade of existing ACE service to double-track conventional <br />operation to improve travel time, frequencies and service reliability. Also includes <br />-680 BART line from Martinez to Warm Springs. <br />• Alternative 2 -One station BART extension east to vicinity of EI Charro Road <br />then down EI Charro and gravel pit areas turning into UPRR consolidated right- <br />of-way with an intermodal station in vicinity of Isabel/Stanley; paired with upgrade <br />of existing ACE services to high speed rail compatible operation. <br />The draft report recommends Alternative 2 for the following reasons: <br />• Isabel/Stanley Station serves an estimated 90% of the ridership of Greenville at <br />about'/2 of the total construction cost. (Alt. 1 ~ 1 Billion vs. Alt. 2 ~ 500 Million). <br />o This assumes that the segment that runs along EI Charro and Stanley is <br />elevated BART track. <br />• Isabel/Stanley Station allows for direct transfer between Altamont Commuter <br />Express and BART. Greenville would require a 5 minute walk between the two <br />stations. <br />• Isabel/Stanley Station would be well served by LAVTA buses. <br />The Tri-Valley PAC has requested additional analyses be conducted on the impact of <br />this recommendation on regional ridership. <br />High Speed Rail <br />The draft report also recognizes the possibility of having a High Speed Rail System <br />serve the Tri-Valley and has provided Regional Rail Plan alternatives that include a <br />High Speed Rail system. <br />The draft report recommends Alternative 2 (Stanley/Isabel Bart Station) with High <br />Speed Rail. <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.