My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
08 ATTACHMENT 4
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
091807
>
08 ATTACHMENT 4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2007 12:09:25 PM
Creation date
9/14/2007 12:09:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/18/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
08 ATTACHMENT 4
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Livermore E1R, and no further traffic, circulation or transportation improvements are required beyond the <br />Improvements in order to mitigate such impacts; (iii) with respect to such Livermore Project, at the time <br />of Livermore's consideration thereof, the levels of service for the EI Charro/Jack London/Stoneridge <br />Intersection and the Jack London/Road A Intersection are not then below level D or worse than those <br />projected for buildout of the El Charro Specific Plan in the Livermore EIR; (iv) with respect to such <br />Livermore Project, such project is in all respects subject to, within the scope of, and consistent with the <br />provisions of, the EI Charm Specific Plan and the Livermore EIR (including the impacts covered <br />thereby); and (v) the Jurisdictions and the Authority do not commit any breach of this Agreement, <br />provided, however, that if Livermore is the Constructing Jurisdiction and construction of the <br />Improvements has been completed in accordance with this Agreement and Livermore has not otherwise <br />committed any breach of this Agreement, Vulcan and its Representatives shall not challenge or oppose <br />Livermore Land Use Approvals for any particular Livermore Project where the cause of breach is clearly <br />attributable to another Jurisdiction or Authority. <br />(b) Staples Ranch Project. Subject to the provisions of this Agreement and <br />the Jurisdictions' and the Authority's compliance therewith, Vulcan and its Representatives shall not <br />challenge or oppose Pleasanton Land Use Approvals for the Staples Ranch Project, provided that: <br />(i) such Land Use Approvals are consistent with the provisions of this Agreement; (ii) Pleasanton <br />reasonably establishes that the traffic, circulation and transportation impacts of the Staples Ranch Project <br />are no greater than analyzed in the Livermore EIR {including but not limited to those reflected in the <br />excerpts from the Livermore EIR set forth in Exhibit M attached hereto and incorporated herein by this <br />reference) and the Pleasanton EIR, and no further tr~c, circulation or transportation improvements are <br />required beyond the Improvements in order to mitigate such impacts; (iii) with respect to any <br />development within the Staples Ranch Project, at the time of Pleasanton's consideration thereof, the <br />levels of service for the El Charro/Jack London/Stoneridge Intersection and the Jack London/Road A <br />Intersection (if then constructed) are not then below level D or worse than those projected for buildout of <br />the El Charro Specific Plan in the Livermore EIR or those projected for buildout of the Staples Ranch <br />Project in the Pleasanton EIR; (iv) with respect to any development within the Staples Ranch Project, <br />such development is in all respects subject to, within the scope of, and consistent with the provisions of <br />the Staples Ranch Project, the Staples Ranch MOU, the Staples Ranch NOP, and the Pleasanton EIR <br />(including the impacts covered thereby) and (iv) the Jurisdictions and the Authority do not commit any <br />breach of this Agreement, provided, however, that if Pleasanton is the Constructing Jurisdiction and <br />construction of the Improvements has been completed in accordance with this Agreement and Pleasanton <br />has not otherwise committed any breach of this Agreement, Vulcan and its Representatives shall not <br />challenge or oppose Pleasanton Land Use Approvals for the Staples Ranch Project where the cause of <br />breach is clearly attributable to another Jurisdiction or Authority. <br />(c) Generally. Subject to the Jurisdictions' and the Authority's compliance <br />with this Agreement, Vulcan shall not join, cooperate with or assist any other party that is taking any <br />action which Vulcan is prohibited from taking pursuant to Sections 11.5(a} and 11.5(b}. Subject to the <br />provisions of this Agreement, Vulcan reserves its right to participate in the review and comment process <br />and/or project approval process for any Projects or other development projects, including proposed <br />projects that are within any Jurisdiction. In no event shall this Agreement be deemed to constitute an <br />admission or agreement by Vulcan as to the validity or accuracy of any provision in the Livermore EIR, <br />the EI Charm Specific Plan, or the Pleasanton EIR. Furthermore, except as expressly set forth in this <br />Agreement, Vulcan shall not be deemed to have consented to: (i) any annexation of property owned or <br />operated by Vulcan to the City of Pleasanton, (ii) any condemnation or dedication of Vulcan owned or <br />controlled property except to the extent constituting an acceptance or partial acceptance of the Offer in <br />accordance with the provisions thereof and this Agreement, or (iii} any Prohibited Access Restrictions or <br />limitations on Vulcan's rights of access to the Quany Lands. <br />002483.0004\793691.13 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.