03 ATTACHMENT 3 - Laserfiche WebLink

the design review for project. In conclusion, she noted she would support approval of the application. A motion was made by Commissioner Maas, seconded by Chairperson Roberts, finding that the project would not have a significant effect on the environment; approving the attached draft Negative Declaration; making the PUD findings be made for the proposed development plan as listed in the staff report; and, recommending approval of Case PUD-99-O1, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit "B," including deletion of Condition No. 88, preservation of Condition No. 89, and modifications to Condition No. 139. Further, that additional conditions be added that fencing should be reviewed at the design review process with as much open fencing as possible; that the Commission will review the design of the twelve homes to ensure individualness and consistency with the west side as well as a blend with the east side of Foothill Road; that street lighting include a more country design; that the median strip on Foothill Road as conditioned for the applicant be further landscaped south at the expense of the City and the School District; that additional details be provided on the regular gate and the cattle gate; and that an open offer of dedication based on the Park District's timing be considered in conjunction with any other future amenities with no guarantees on future development. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: Commissioners Kameny, Maas, and Chairperson Roberts NOES: Commissioner Sullivan ABSENT: Commissioner Kumaran ABSTAIN: None Resolution No. PC-99-64 and -65 were entered and adopted as motioned. EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, September 8, 1999 Page 6 of 6