My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
091807
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2007 11:14:03 AM
Creation date
9/14/2007 11:14:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/18/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BACKGROUND <br />As a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) "entitlement city," the City is <br />responsible for the preparation of an annual performance report called the Consolidated <br />Annual Performance and Evaluation Report, or CAPER. The CAPER is intended to <br />provide a systematic format for reporting on the use of CDBG entitlement funds and is <br />required by Section 104(e) of the Housing and Community Development Act. The <br />CAPER provides detailed information on the use of CDBG funds by subrecipients (the <br />agencies receiving funds) during the prior fiscal year. <br />The CAPER process is intended to provide an opportunity for public participation and <br />input at the local level. The information submitted in the report provides an evaluation <br />of grantee and jurisdiction performance to HUD. The CAPER is forwarded to HUD in <br />Washington after holding a public hearing and receiving City Council approval. The City <br />must submit its CAPER for FY 2006 (06/07) to HUD by September 30, 2007. <br />DISCUSSION <br />The agencies which received funds in FY 2006 are listed in the attached Table P-1. <br />Table P-2 provides a summary of the following statistics for each of the agencies which <br />received CDBG funds in FY 2006: 1) use of funds (budgeted vs. spent); 2) subrecipient <br />accomplishments /project status; 3) performance measures (a new requirement that <br />was recently introduced by HUD); and 4) statistics on households and/or persons <br />assisted (e.g., number of beneficiaries, income level, ethnicity, family status, etc.). <br />As shown in Table P-2, CDBG and City funds allocated in FY 2006 benefited 1,092 <br />primarily low-income individuals through various projects, programs, and services <br />coordinated through subrecipients. The information contained in Table P-2 was <br />submitted by subrecipient agencies and is consistent with staff's evaluation of agency <br />activity. <br />In addition to this statistical information, an important element of the CAPER process is <br />the opportunity for presentations by each of the subrecipient agencies. At a meeting of <br />the Human Services Commission held on September 5, a schedule was established to <br />enable presentations by each agency which received FY 2006 CDBG funds. The <br />minutes of this meeting were not yet available to include with this report. However, in <br />addition to a discussion of statistical information for each CDBG project, most agencies <br />elaborated on "human interest" and other aspects which were not apparent in project <br />statistics. Agencies also expressed their thanks to the Commission and to the City <br />Council for the support offered through the CDBG funding. <br />Because of the fact that agencies had the opportunity to make detailed presentations at <br />the September 5 Human Services Commission meeting, the public hearing <br />requirements have been substantially addressed. However, agency representatives or <br />other interested members of the public will have the opportunity to make comments <br />concerning the CAPER at the September 18 meeting. Similarly, the Council and public <br />may raise issues for discussion. <br />Page2of3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.