My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
090407
>
18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2007 5:19:51 PM
Creation date
8/30/2007 5:19:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/4/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
18
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BACKGROUND <br />A hot mix asphalt plant produces asphalt concrete by mixing gravel and sand with crude <br />oil derivatives. This asphalt is used to pave roads and parking lots. Sometimes rubber <br />and recycled asphalt are added to the mix to make rubberized asphalt, which is also <br />used for roads. In the summer of 2002, Granite Construction Company constructed and <br />started to operate a hot mix asphalt plant on land now owned by CEMEX in the <br />unincorporated area of Alameda County. Although the address for this plant is <br />1544 Stanley Boulevard, the plant is physically located east of the Vineyard Avenue <br />Corridor adjacent to the arroyo. It is also within 1,000 feet of the Vineyard Avenue site <br />where Neal Elementary may be built. Alameda County staff approved this plant without <br />subjecting it to any public review process. <br />In the late 1950's, Alameda County issued a Quarry Permit for the property now owned <br />by CEMEX. Apparently, at that time, there was an asphalt plant located on the property <br />and the use of the property for "asphalt batching plants" was permitted "at the location <br />as presently conducted." No CEQA review was conducted at that time in that CEQA <br />was not adopted until 1971. Later, the use of that plant was discontinued. <br />In 1977, the County Planning Commission approved a permit for the construction of <br />another asphalt batch plant on this site but in a location much further northeasterly of <br />the current batch plant. In approving this permit, the County adopted a Negative <br />Declaration. Interestingly, the City of Pleasanton appealed this decision due to <br />concerns of additional truck traffic, but the Board of Supervisors denied the appeal. <br />That plant, however, was never built. <br />In 2002, Granite Construction Company sought approval from the County to build a <br />portable hot mix asphalt plant. (The County has indicated that after 1977, there was on <br />the property a portable asphalt plant of the same size and capacity as the plant built by <br />Granite; this portable plant was located about 200 feet away from where the new plant <br />was eventually constructed.) The County staff gave administrative approval as to this <br />new plant. That staffs rationale for so doing was based on the original Quarry Permit <br />issued in the 1950's, the modifications made in 1977, the fact that the plant would <br />replace a comparable plant of similar size and capacity, and that the County had never <br />received a post approval complaint about any asphalt plant in the County. Accordingly, <br />the County staff determined that the approval was a ministerial act with only building <br />permits required. <br />In 2002, Granite also received a permit from the Bay Area Air Quality Management <br />District to operate its hot mix asphalt plant. The application that Granite submitted <br />certified that plant was not within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of the nearest school <br />and provided that a CEQA document had been prepared for this project by Alameda <br />County. (The certification is technically accurate in that there is a school site, but not an <br />actual school, within 1,000 feet; the Air Quality Management District checked the <br />database of schools from the California Department of Education and that database <br />indicated there was no school within 1,000 feet of the proposed plant. As to CEQA, <br />unless Granite was referring to the 1977 Negative Declaration, its statement seems <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.